Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Godaddy ad pulled during super bowl - fox censorship

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
pimpbot Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 11:24 PM
Original message
Godaddy ad pulled during super bowl - fox censorship
http://wizbangblog.com/archives/005007.php

The NFL persuaded FOX to pull our ad.

We immediately contacted Fox to find out what happened. Here's what we were told: After our first ad was aired, the NFL became upset and they, together with Fox, decided to pull the ad from running a second time. Because we purchased two spots, we were also entitled to a "Brought to you by GoDaddy.com" 5 second marquis spot. They also chose to pull the marquis spot.

I thought the first one was funny and poked fun at the overreacting FCC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh the irony! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lauri16 Donating Member (509 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Welcome to the land of censorship
This is getting beyond scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Hi Lauri16!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lauri16 Donating Member (509 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Hi newyawker99!
Thanx! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agitpropagent9 Donating Member (169 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. fox are idiots
and you'd think they would have vetted the commercials before airtime (both they and the nfl) - especially since it wasn't a surprise and had been "leaked" on cable news days before the broadcast.

all that said, i would like to hear from those crying "censorship" on how they reach that semantical conclusion.

like crying "wolf", it only serves to diminish real censorship claims and seems a little hysterical in this case (in my opinion).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe they would prefer a shirtless gay man?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lauri16 Donating Member (509 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did Tony Danza really get fined, too?
I didn't see it, but my husband said that Tony Danza was talking this morning about a thing that Tony did outside just before his show on Friday (??) with Kathy Lee Gifford. I guess KLG grabbed Tony's shirt and ripped it.....ala Janet Jackson style......and bared Tony's *gasp* bare chest. My husband said that this morning, Tony said that he got fined for it. WTF?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TOhioLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. WTF?
are they afraid of man-boobs now? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. Faux freedom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. I thought the first add was pretty funny, too...especially the chairman...
...of the committee having to take oxygen! LOL!!! :-))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. Time for a new Logo - where's all them PhotChopping wizards this year?
.
.
.

I snagged last years !
















:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. You thought it was funny... I found it insulting.
A woman barely clad, speaking in a Marilyn Monroe voice (addressing CONGRESS), with a bunch of ugly old men salivating... Utterly tasteless and sexist.

That said... it did poke fun at the FCC, and it's pretty damn ironic that FOX broke their contract with them. My suspicion is that they received a whole lot of prissy phone calls right after it aired. Personally, I just muted the stupid TV during it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. They said 8 phone calls to the FCC
The story is that the NFL execs raised hell when it aired the first time and that Fox pulled the second airing. To my mind GoDaddy got more than their money's worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. No Publicity Is Bad Publicity
I'm sure that godaddy is now enjoying a success that its ads running unmolested would not have afforded them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. Sorry, I didn't think it was funny
and neither did the others who were watching the game with me. In fact, it led to a discussion regarding,do makers of this kind of sexist drivel consider that FAMILIES are watching this--not just adolescent (minded) guys? And if so, how do they think female viewers respond to this, and do they consider what kind of an effect this has on boys and girls? We all thought it sucked--this included the men, and we are not prudes or theo-cons, we are all well-educated liberals>moderates who agree that the airwaves are WAY oversaturated with overtly sexual--and sexist--imagery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lauri16 Donating Member (509 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I thought the whole point to the commercial was funny
The fact that they were making fun of the FCC. As a female, I *did* think it was funny. I'm a well educated, liberal. Was that commercial any worse than the commercials about erectile dysfunction? Or needing a "warming lubricant"?

I'm tired of being told what I can see and what I can't see on TV. I pay my satellite bill, I expect to be able to make that decision all on my own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I dont want to fight with you or anyone else about this,
and I know it is a topic that elicits STRONG responses. I expressed one side, and I speak for millions, and you do too. I dont care what you watch, but you ought to have respect for those who do not want that kind of stuff (inc commercials about erectile dysfunction, warming lubricant et al) to catch them by surprise during prime time, public airwave TV. Turning the channel does no good after the fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lauri16 Donating Member (509 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. It's all good.......
I didn't mean to come off sounding like my opinion was the only one that mattered. I do understand totally where you're coming from in that it's a small part of a larger program where changing the channel isn't an option.

My whole problem is probably a whole different topic on the censorship issue. ie: censoring entire shows. I just combined my thoughts in one issue. Sorry about that. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. any kids. raising any young boys in this culture
how about girls. raising any young girls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. good for you all. about tired of being labeled fundie
cause i as female dont think it is cute. not made for me, they dont care if it is offensive to me, and not a good representation for our youth.

the only ad i walked into. stood at the door watching the ad, and husband says for real. the only ad like that so far. for real. why the hell did i walk in at this time. only me.

a bunch of men dissing women telling women they are suppose to validate this or we have a problem. not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. LOL -- you have the same bad luck as i seem to.
I swear I have an inner radar that causes me to come in at all the wrong (or right) moments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. my husband is offended and damn tired of the erectile dysf ads
and i am totally respectful and appreciate his take on it and stand firmly behind him in his being offended by the never ending ads being put in these football games. he rolled his eyes to the ad at the end of the game saying, geez, we almost made it thru the game without hearing about enhancing a hard on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. The only saving grace of the erectile dysfunction ads
from my standpoint is that FINALLY the guys get a little taste of what we have had to put up with for the last 30+ years--with 1st, tampon and douche ads, then on and on and on...I can hardly keep from snickering when those come on- they are so foul, but it is SUCH payback time!!
:toast: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. hey when they started, i would exclaim.......
how offensive. i would be so offended if i were a guy that is just horrible that they are doing this to you males.

yup

hey saw an ad yesterday, a new pill that will reduce womens periods to 4 times a year. that would have to be one huge ass period. what are we doing to ourselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I do feel sorry for them re those hard-on ads...
Not just my husband, but sheesh, my poor 70 year old Dad had to watch that crap with his daughters in the room (and vice versa!)... and I wonder what my 10-year old nephew thought of it... I thought it was fun for awhile to have the "payback" of these male-exploiting ads, but it's already gotten very old. I just don't remember my husband ever feeling compassionate towards me back when only women were exploited in tv commercials... and I do think he has learned something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. i really dont like it for my sons.
they are learning the functions of their body, they dont need to be seeing about a pill that will give them that already confusing hard on. and man, i dont ever want a male to be feeling they have to take a drug to satisfy a woman. that is the sickest. now my father, has issues, and that pill is a good thing, and hoorah for him. but the ads are now saying young healthy men take it to have better sex, and to satisfy your woman like they cant without a pill. it really is offensive, and it really is a bad thing to start convincing our boys of

in my view

i want everyone to just leave all of us alone, and have a terrific free fun filled sex filled lives ..............without contaminating it every way we can
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I couldn't agree with you more....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lauri16 Donating Member (509 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I guess I understand what you're saying
about the barely dressed part. I just liked the fact that they were making fun of the FCC. Personally, I don't really care about the rest of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. i liked they were making fun of it too, but.......it was at the expense
Edited on Tue Feb-08-05 01:37 PM by seabeyond
of woman. i personally did not get the whole ad, just the end where she was acting all stupid and her top kept falling off. just stupid. so when you said it was about making fun of fcc i paused. but no...........

there were miller commercials going after coors. coors had the boob twin commercial. the first one i loved the song and would always raise head to see commercial, forgetting. they did all they could to angle camera up the dress or down the bra top. by the third commercial they had one of the coor twins crawling on the ground, humping mother earth, in winter, snow around, about naked, licking lips to the camera. started making her lips to give blow job as she crawls to the camera. they cut off from her to a room of young males, drinking, in group, yelling and screaming and rootin, for her, to what.................crawl thru the camera and give each a blow job? about the most offensive ad i have seen yet. this owner ran for senator in colorado on family values.

miller came out with an ad using near naked women fightin in water to laugh at coors audacity.

i liked that miller did it, yet

miller also did the same thing to women, as they are pointing the finger at coors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. Ditto that n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
24. GoDaddy will recover all the costs of their original ad in their lawsuit.
HA HA good for them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCappedBandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
31. Does anybody have more examples of censored ads from FOX?
I am currently in a debate about why FOX is viewed as "conservative"
One of my arguments was that they censored ads which go against the company's political views
I wasn't able to find a satisfactory amount of articles relating to this issue, though.. so any help would be greatly appreciated! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
41. FOX is *not* conservative.

Fox News is conservative. I don't believe that Fox Entertainment is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCappedBandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Sorry
I should have made it clear that i WAS referring to Fox NEWS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
32. It was a great ad
They have the ad, and a 2 minute version, on their website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lakemonster11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
34. I thought the ad was really stupid.
Yes, I *got* that they were making fun of the FCC, and yes, I support that sort of satire, but it was just such poor quality. It was like something a random group of people would have come up with if they were given a camera for a few hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
35. Ms. Eleanor Flatow?
Wonder how they came up with that name? Hmmmm.

The ad is demeaning and insulting. Is it indecent? I don't think so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
36. Takes us forward to the nineteen forties and fifties when
censorship of anything sexual was strictly enforced. Even Ricky and Lucy, who were married in both real life and sitcom life, had to sleep in separate beds on their sitcom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
37. was this the one with the hottie who's top almost fell off?
that was the only commercial i saw, because i could give a shit about the superbowl.

it was a thumb right in the FCC's eye. i applaud them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E-Z-B Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
38. The goDaddy.com ad was a breath of fresh air
in light of the conservative trend now taking place throughout television. Such as Fox blurring out a cartoon "bottom" on an episode of Family Guy that originally showed the "bottom" when it aired nearly 5 years ago. This ad was nothing compared to what a lot of other countries air on television. We are by far one of the most conservative countries in the world.

Here's the FULL goDaddy.com ad if anyone missed it:
http://a1848.g.akamai.net/7/1848/13927/v001/godaddysof1.download.akamai.com/13755/1FULLCOVERAGE_LARGE.swf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
39. I liked the ad in the sense that it was a brave slap in the face of the
conservafucks in the FCC's face because they'll allow Ditka to talk about making his dick hard for up to four hours, but any cleavage is verboten.

Fuck that. Grow up. All of you.

On the other hand, I couldn't see how that spot would give them any business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. What's so brave about that tired old T&A?
Same old crap but in a new package that somehow makes it supposedly "gutsy" with a liberal, political edge? I hate the theo-cons as much as you, but imo it was a sophomoric example of irony, so that the dumbest among us would "get it", while at the same time get they get alot of attention for their company with a tired old T&A cheap shot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC