Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Any legal restrictions on setting up a *news* agency or calling yourself

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 11:32 AM
Original message
Any legal restrictions on setting up a *news* agency or calling yourself
one? Seems to me a large part of this Gannon/Guckert debacle deals with some guy, like ANY OF US, on the internet getting a domain (among others), using the word *NEWS* in it, and then pretending to be a reporter. What made him legit, if anything?

In reading the Daily KOS interview with Joseph Wilson, he didn't question Guckert's credentials, all that yokel had to do was say he represented conservative Talon News.

And, especially with the White House, what kind of vetting do they do? It seems that anyone properly vetted can get a one-day press pass to sit in on the briefing-so any of us that pass some kind of security muster could put a *press pass* sticker in our hat and go listen to Scottie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. There have been several attempts to license journalists...
Clearly such things have the potential to destroy freedom of the press.

No matter how Roverer successfully uses and manipulates people like Gannon or the MSM, I argue the press should be free and let the readers beware.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think it is interesting...
and certainly to be remembered that Joe Farah's WorldNet Daily was refused, on a number of occasions, credentials for its "reporters". In the world of rampant wingnuttery, few hold a candle to Joe and his people. That said, they are a *little* closer to a credible news-gathering organization than this kitche sink abortion that is Talon.

The question is: Why does Talon have all this apparent cred? I suspect that the answers can be found in its relationship to L'affaire Plame, FweepeeLand, and their benefactors, whomever they might be. Somewhere along the way, a marker was called on their behalf.

Just the sort of thing one might expect if the person calling the marker wanted to give a hand up to his journalist rent boy, perhaps. Stranger things have happened. It wouldn't be the first time.

Next question: Remember, back in the Poppy41 admin, there was a scandal regarding gay prostitutes and their access to the White House and its personel? It was all over that bird cage liner, The Washington Slimes. Could this have anything to do with that situation? The parrelels are noticable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You can get media credentials from Universal Life Church
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not...
White House Media Credentials. A whole different beasty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I Think We Need To Redirect...
While "Gannon's" credentials are a joke (yet the MSM media is ignoring this story like a bad hair day), the question no one seems to be asking is who credentialed him at the WH. Also, since we know all these "impromptu" press conferences are staged, who decided he was to be called on (Scotty???) and if (or shall we say who) supplied his question...just like the witchhunt that followed the question asked of Rummy.

Then...we need someone who can connect a couple dots...Talon right into the regime. I know the trail is coming together...we need to push it toward the regime and away from "Gannon".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Very good point. Who invited him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Correct, we need to follow the trail and see where it leads.
Focus on the issues that this exposed and not be sidetracked by the drama of Gannon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. One DUer has already done this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC