Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The terror attack on the US was a one shot deal...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 12:04 PM
Original message
The terror attack on the US was a one shot deal...
It will be forever viewed by the Arab world as a day of celebration - the day they defeated the evil Satan, America. They do not need another victory. They have it already.

The reaction by the ill-prepared leaders of this nation was simply one of revenge and fear, promulgated mostly because of the embarrassed and stricken military planners in the Pentagon. After all, they were one of the targets on that fateful day.

The present war in Iraq is separate from the orignal "war on terror". As we can all see, there is hardly the violence in Afghanistan that there is in Iraq. Just where were the terrorists?? They were easily defeated - the rag-tag bunch of Taliban supporters in that forsaken country.

The sad truth is that we have been deceived and led down a path of war that was not necessary. We all know there were 3000 killed on Sept 11th. There is no rational reason to use that disaster as a reason to declare war on the world or to lie our country into believing we are in a war on terror equal to the Cold War in its propensity.

We are living a lie promoted by the failure named George W Bush and his embarrassed comrades. The war on terror is virtually over. It was defeated in Afghanistan. The other "war" has nothing to do with 9/11 or the war on terror. Unfortunately , it is a truth America is not ready to yet accept. There must be more Americans die and come home crippled - mentally, physically, and emotionally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would have to agree.
It is all a bunch of lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wouldn't count on it-- depends on how badly they want to go into Iran.
Moreover, 9/11 was an inside job-- the whole thing was bogus from the start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Two years ago I would have called you nuts. Now, I give it 60/40 in favor
I say there is a 100% chance of at least gross negligence.

My personal feeling is to give it a 60% chance that Bush KNEW about the attack, and 50% that he COOPERATED and helped plan the attack.

My "gut feeling" after watching him read "My Pet Goat" is that he knew there would be an attack on the WTC. I don't think he knew they were planning to also attack the Pentagon, White House and The Capital Building. I think that's why he finally decided to get off his ass and leave-- he was afraid that he'd been betrayed and was being personally targeted.

Here's one reason why I believe he was complicit in the attacks, that I don't think anyone else has mentioned.

Much of the pResident's schedule is publicly available. If they wanted to put him out of our misery, they would have known when he would have been home, or where he would have been someplace else where they could hit him.

I think they intentionally AVOIDED hitting Bush. And that just makes him look all the more guilty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. They may need another attack to push their agenda and divert
the American people from seeing the true bu$h regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. I disagree.
WTC was attacked in 1993 under Clintons watch. The 9/11 attack was the second.

Whether or not these attacks were soley the acts of foriegn extremists or if they were "encouraged" as stated by LIHOP or MIHOP, the forces that created these attacks are still at play. There will be a 3rd, and a 4th...

I do agree that the 9/11 was invalidly used as rational for the Iraq War which was not otherwise supportable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And Puerto Rican radicals shot up the House of Representatives...
Edited on Wed Feb-09-05 12:34 PM by kentuck
seems I recall something like that happening in the 50's or 60's? So, our country has always had enemies and will continue to have them. How could we not? However, the present threat is exaggerated in the sense that it is build up to be on a par with the Cold War. We defeated the "original" terrorists in Afghanistan, although their leader, Bin Laden is still at large. And we have a minimal number of troops in that country at present. The "war on terror" is virtually over, in my opinion. But we are creating a new "war" based on the "terror" premise but is creating more enemies than the orignal war on terror had in total. We are being largely deceived. Even though there is still a threat to our nation, it is not that different from other threats we have had in the past. It is a continuing lie, in my opinion, to have the country believe and fear that our existence is in question because of the threat of "terrorism".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. The only terrorists we have to fear
are those that reside in the WH.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TR Fan Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. And the logic is?
"It will be forever viewed by the Arab world as a day of celebration -the day they defeated the evil Satan, America. They do not need another victory. They have it already."

WOULD-BE-TERRORIST1: Let's attack the U.S.

WOULD-BE-TERRORIST2: No way, been there, done that. Let's go score some dope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC