So Gannon says he registered his porn sites for another person

[trumad]

several years ago? Here's what he said: Wolf: One of the things that was said sexually explicit websites working on?

Gannon: Well several years ago before I came to washington I had registered various domain names for private client doing website development; those sites were never hosted, nothing ever went up on those websites the client went on; so much about me on the internet, people have made assumptions about; can't address all charges here.


Let's see when these were registered?

Hotmilitarystud.com creation date: 12-apr-2001

Militaryescorts.com creation date: 11-may-2000

Militaryescortsm4m.com creation date: 11-may-2000

[seventythree]

1. what's with the MSM saying none of these

were ever on-line -- I thought someone here had gone to the last one -- which one has his pic in the skivvies?

[monobrau]

5. That was an old aol page

Lots of people own domain names that they never use, so that isn't so hard to believe.

[monobrau]

2. Beat me to it!

Just a youthful indiscretion, nothing to see here.

[Sequoia]

8. Maybe like Gropanator Ahnold in Sunny Cal he was being "rowdy"

[caligirl]

3. Nice touch there!

[Nite Owl]

4. And who might that be?

Is the voracious liberal press corps asking that question? Sure they will be right on it.:grr:

[Inland]

15. His noncom boyfriend.

See, nothing to worry the homophobes at all.

[PurityOfEssence]

16. That would be the obvious approach, wouldn't it?

Sadly, though, this is a diversion from the real story. All connections between Talon and Texas should be worked now, as should all the questions Lautenberg is raising. The question should be directly asked whether there are others who have been deliberately planted among the press so we can catch them in some lies.

There have been so many lies; it shouldn't be hard to paint them as the world-class frauds with no sense of societal decency that they are.

[Skittles]

29. it's Catch-22

the sex angle is the only way they'd pay any attention at all

[Shredr]

And what's he doing posing in tighty whiteys and dogtags?

Is he just a model for the site?

[Renew Deal]

6. There is a difference between updating the records and renewing.

You should clarify that. The records are updated constantly without the owners intervention.

[trumad]

14. You're right.. I deleted that part..

But now I'm off to see when he came to Washington.

[merh]

33. Maybe he registered the names to prevent their use by

real "perverts"! He was just protecting the moral majority! <<sarcasm>>

[ultraist]

7. Email that to WOLF and ask WHY he didn't do any research or call

Gannon out on that.

That was NOT an interview. SHAME ON WOLF for providing a platform for Gannon to whine and lie.

[libertypirate]

12. Corporate News Network

[ewagner]

13. Like this?

That's a new low even for you Wolf........the only reason I watched your show today was to see the interview with Gannon, otherwise I would not have wasted my time. I was hoping you would show some journalistic integrity but, as usual, you took a pass.

That was the least objective, softest interview I've ever seen. How come you didn't ask how he got access to the top secret memo about Valerie Plame?

How come you didn't ask, if he only developed those "male escort service" web sites for a client, then why was HIS PICTURE IN UNDERWEAR AND DOG TAGS on the the site?

So which government agency pays you? Whichever it is, I hope it's enough to buy you a new conscience.

[Skittles]

31. anyone have this picture?

have not seen it

[globalvillage]

18. Hey, what's good enough for the White House...

is good enough for Wolf!

[Adenoid_Hynkel]

9. yeah, pimping servicemen is ok if you do it for another person

don't you lib'ruls know anything?
why do you hate america so much?

[mzmolly]

10. Send them to Blitza!

;)

[libertypirate]

11. The bottom two aren't porn sites BTW

Escort service is something a little more sinister then gay porn.

Who's mandate in the whitehouse was he?

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

17. I believe there was a plan to exploit gay people

and I want to know what it is

[Democrat 4 Ever]

19. Gannon was just doing a favor for someone else...

doesn't that remind you of your youth when you got caught with some contraband by the parents and you said it, "wasn't your's, I'm just holding it for Billy, Susie, or Grandma." Yeah, right.

Let's have some names Gannon - who did you do the favor for? Huh? Huh? Whose site it is? Which one of your repug friends will step up to the plate and claim ownership?

[Shakespeare]

20. Not just gay people, but gay people in the military.

I agree. Something's up with this.

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

22. For all we know this was an orchestrated attempt to out gays in the

military..or worse.

[ObaMania]

32. ???

Not that there's anything wrong with it but... he IS gay isn't he? I personally have a hunch he is. Not that there's anything wrong with it!

[ignu]

21. This idiot couldn't set up blog software.

He has a web host that had php/mysql, and all his sites are static html and never got off the ground.

http://www.conservativeguy.com/previous_topics.htm
http://www.conservativeguy.com/gay.htm
http://www.conservativeguy.com/BLACK.htm

And he's trying to sell people on the fact that HE HAS WEB CLIENTS?

[Radio-Active]

23. how come if you go to those sites

they ask for a username and password?

sounds like the sites were being used..

[ObaMania]

27. Looks like the login to the administrator console provided by the..

Web Hosting company.

[ObaMania]

24. doing website development, huh?

I'd be interested in seeing some of his work!

That f@&king Leslie gave him a free pass. Maybe we should call him on it!

[The Backlash Cometh]

25. So, between 2001 and 2003, who did he meet to change his life?

[SoCalDem]

26. If they were inactive and someone else's WHY did HE have them

prominently displayed on HIS site????

Hmmmmmm, Jeffie????

[Elidor]

34. Excellent point, SoCal

And why would he register a "client's" sites in his own name? They would never be able to change web hosts without his permission, nor could they renew their domains without him. But's that's all piffle. He's lying about it, and YOU just asked the $64,000 question.

[Buddyblazon]

28. So Jeff...or James...or whatever the hell your name is...

what is your explanation for the hot and bothered picture of you in your skivvies on one of these websites?

[ObaMania]

30. Is anyone going to do research on..

.. the "wealthy" TX businessman Leslie referred to?

PS.. Gannon was lying between his teeth throughout the entire interview and Leslie just let him.

[seventythree]

35. here's a wild thought

because of Gannon I have now read the late 80's Washington Times (did the Moonies own it then?) expose about the child sex ring that implicated government officials in the Reagan/Bush WH, and read about the Franklin Scandal in Nebraska involving Larry King who was a hot shot in the GOP and went to jail for embezzling from the Franklin S&L and was alleged,(investigated by the Nebraska Legislature), to be operating a child sex ring for GOP operatives. What if they are up to their old tricks, but need to use adults lest we hang them for using kids. Who would have a great deal to lose and may be willing to keep their mouths shut while doing their duty for the party leading their country? Gays in the military and what a better way to recruit them than with a guy they can see on CNN in the press pool? Gannon provides the escorts, and gains the personal power which comes from being able to expose his clients.

[Beetwasher]

36. "They're NOT MY DRUGS! I Swear! I Was Holding Them FOR A FRIEND!!"

I'm telling you! They ain't mine! :eyes: