Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WH's Scott McClellan Says He Knew "Gannon" Was "Guckert"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:12 PM
Original message
WH's Scott McClellan Says He Knew "Gannon" Was "Guckert"
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000798395

McClellan : Hang on. I think he's been coming for more than two years now.

Q: Under what name?

McClellan: Sorry?

Q: Under what name?

McClellan: Well, you have to get cleared. You have to -- just like anybody else that comes to the White House, you have to have your full name, your Social Security number, and your birth date. So you have to be cleared just like anybody else.

Q: So he was being cleared under James Guckert, or whatever his name is?

McClellan: My understanding, yes.
Q: Were you aware that he had another name?

McClellan: Was I aware? I had heard that. I had heard that, yes, recently.

Q: But did you know during all this time that he really wasn't Jeff Gannon?

McClellan: I heard at some point, yes -- previously

==

So in other words the White House freely admits they KNEW that "Gannon" was a fictitious name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mike Niendorff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. On the CNN "interview" today:

Guckert also claimed that, when he got his daily press passes, he did so under his real name. Therefore, they HAD to know who he really was.


MDN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Probably used that name at the bath house McClellan met him
at...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. They are choking themselves to death!
These cretins are up to their eyeballs now and know no way out. This is delicious! I love watching the bush Nazis squirm. :headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. We're overdue for some "intelligence"...
...CREDIBLE reports that Al Quaeda is planning to attack somewhere in the U.S., not actual details but we're raising the terra alert to "Orange Julius," and will keep it there until you shut the F**K up about Gannon.

Hugs and big sloppy wet kisses,

YOUR government at work.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I wish I had your optimism...
Maybe I'm being a pessimist, but I see this Gannon thing going nowhere.

The media is successfully positioning this story as a case of vociferous liberals whining about a conservative reporter gaining White-House-press access.

I don't see how this story could evolve into something.

I'm so used to hearing about "gotcha" moments with these criminal-thug Republicans--and then watching the stories fizzle into obscurity.

Maybe I'm just being a sourpuss today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The media and the Monkey Palace can engage theatrical damage control
But the salacious aspect to the public is that they vetted a homosexual with little or no journalistic credibility, an individual who was in the business of luring and prostituting military men. And that just begs the question of asking how many in our military are homosexual. After all, why have the site if there aren't any gays in the military?

"Support The Troops"? I don't think it comes in a rainbow-colored magnet.

To go after the Repubs, you have to use their biggest weapon against them: homosexual sex. Add to that his treachery in possibly revealing the name of Plame, why, the Monkey Palace might just offer him up as a sacrificial lamb.

I think Gannon knows too much. His life span may be considerably shortened now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Mr. Fake has received a subpoena supposedly to determine why
he referred to a memo that supposedly no other journalist had - all related to the Plame leak.

This is the big deal here. The press conference phoniness and cooperation, plus the male prostitution is way down the priority ladder.

This cannot go away and any politician in Washington who tries to write this off should be kicked out.

He is an insider-insider funded by insiders-insiders.

He was picked and used. He is not of his own making.

You and all of us have a role to play in keeping the Plame thing front and center.

MSM is only going to address the press credentials. It is the only safe ground. Plame - flames. Prostitution - flames.

So, if you say it will die because the MSM killed it, you must mean the press credentials part of it. The rest is up to us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC