Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Carly Fiorina and HewlettPackard a metaphor for the Bush presidency?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 09:54 PM
Original message
Is Carly Fiorina and HewlettPackard a metaphor for the Bush presidency?
The following is from toward the end of a Salon.com article by a reporter close to the scene at HP about Fiorina's firing at HP and what it means about our business culture.




End of a hatchet woman
Hewlett-Packard's ousted CEO Carly Fiorina destroyed a great company's creative soul and trashed its business.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Lawrence M. Fisher

from 2/3 of the way through the article.

"At the time, I was on staff at a consulting firm that was retained by one of the family foundations to analyze the merger. In the process, we spoke with a number of people close to both companies and their remarks were stunning. "The collision of two garbage trucks," was how one put it. "Doubling down on a dog," was another take. Without naming the firm, or their specific recommendations, it was obvious to anyone who cared to look that Carly's projections could only materialize if IBM, Dell and Sun Microsystems took a collective nap for the next five years, and every single one of her rosiest scenararios come true at once. Any resemblance to the Bush budget is entirely coincidental, I'm sure.


So why did she do it? For one reason: Wall Street loves big mergers. The investment banks collect immense fees for their roles as advisors, regardless of the ultimate soundness of the deal. And their securities analysts all write positive reports, which prompt a lot of rubes to buy shares, which generates a flood of trading commissions. Big mergers and acquisitions are almost always a net negative for the companies and communities involved, but a win-win for the bankers, lawyers and other deal makers.


A second reason is that it should have worked well enough for Carly to declare victory and move on to the political stage. Despite their dismal long-term success record, big mergers usually can "achieve synergies," Wall Street-speak for massive layoffs, which reduce costs enough to show a big if fleeting bump in earnings per share."

more <http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2005/02/10/carly/index.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wrinkle_In_Time Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow! That is really bad writing...
Edited on Thu Feb-10-05 10:23 PM by Wrinkle_In_Time
"At the time, I was on staff at a consulting firm that was retained by one of the family foundations to analyze the merger. In the process, we spoke with a number of people close to both companies and their remarks were stunning. "The collision of two garbage trucks," was how one put it. "Doubling down on a dog," was another take. Without naming the firm, or their specific recommendations, it was obvious to anyone who cared to look that Carly's projections could only materialize if IBM, Dell and Sun Microsystems took a collective nap for the next five years, and every single one of her rosiest scenararios come true at once. Any resemblance to the Bush budget is entirely coincidental, I'm sure.


At the time, I was on staff at an advertising firm for Compaq. Doesn't that makes me as qualified (if not more so) than the person who was "retained by one of the family foundations to analyze the merger"? Probably not, but at least I promise not to write flowery statements like: "The collision of two garbage trucks" and "Doubling down on a dog.". How old is the person who wrote that shit?

What happened with the HP-Compaq merger was a good example of really bad decisions and corporate arrogance. Many people who earned less than Carly et al paid dearly for this corporate hubris. I don't give a hoot about the chromosomes of the person who led this, it was a really bad strategy. Many people said it then and they can confirm it now.

Fiorina made some colossal mistakes. She managed to drive two powerful, pioneering high-tech companies into the ground. She now walks away from this pile-up with US$21M in cash and probably lucrative opportunities on the corporate speakers' tour.

Stretching this into an allegory of the Bush** administration seems unnecessary to me -- we should simply point to it as yet another corporate mind-fuck gone bad. Blivet** and pals are producing enough evil without having to use HP as a cudgel.

{Edited for stunningly bad grammatical errors. I should either stop drinking or posting... let's see which.}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC