Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

JOHN ARAVOSIS is King! LINK to CNN broadcast clip re: Gannon!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:28 PM
Original message
JOHN ARAVOSIS is King! LINK to CNN broadcast clip re: Gannon!
Edited on Thu Feb-10-05 11:11 PM by Bluebear
on edit: VIEW the segment here:

http://americablog.blogspot.com/


He shut down Aaron "Isn't it unseemly to go after Gannon" Brown discussing what Aaron referred to as a "little story" with a "so what" quality.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yinkaafrica Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. I love that animated GIF!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Grab it :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
68. Me too! N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, this was a good day for us thru John, thank you
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes - he was great!
and got all the points in before Aaron could spin the topic back to poor picked on Gannon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. fuckin' A! that guy told it like it is, and brown didn't know WHAT the
fuck to do...I loved it when he told aaron what he said was a "bunch of hogwash" aaron said something unintelligiable in the background.

classic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Aaron kept trying to dismiss with condescending little smirks...
and John would bring up another salient point, like "hey, this guy told us to bring it on and find out more about me. And we did." Or "Are you kidding? Everything in the WH press room is choreographed!" Or "How did he become privy to the Valerie Plame briefing." Classic is right!

(Yo goodboy!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. what's up Blue? Sold a DC1, and DGC1M4 in the last two days!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. There's nothing wrong with 'devil's advocate' questions, but...
Brown went beyond that. He definitely seemed to be belittling the story; cut them short. Then he went on and on with the Camilla Bowles crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Agreed re: devil's advocate. But Brown tipped his hand early today
when he summarized his show tonight by discussing what "all the fuss" was about this "little story". Sorry, AB!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ezee Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It appeared that Aaron
had one too many glasses of kool aid today. He generally doesn't drink that much of the serum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I was shocked that there was no lunatic from the right to "counter" John
Still, Aaron couldn't get out of that segment quick enough, could he? hehehehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
25. me too! That was unusual!
Go Aaron! But he spent the whole segment stuttering with his foot in his mouth.

Our bloggers were magnificent. cheers for them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #25
47. People in another thread seemed to think this is Brown's ploy...
...to get the comments out there, but be able to tell his bosses he didn't say it. That would be awful subtle of him.

kicking!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. Here's the 'positive interpretation of Aaron Brown' thread link:
Edited on Fri Feb-11-05 10:48 AM by Hissyspit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wrinkle_In_Time Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. I try not to watch CNN and I really don't like Brown's style...
Edited on Thu Feb-10-05 10:54 PM by Wrinkle_In_Time
... but I also had to search for "JOHN ARAVOSIS" (sorry).

I would appreciate it if someone would summarise what Aravosis said to shut down Brown and get this important point across. What did he say that managed to cut though the usual BS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. He said:
Edited on Thu Feb-10-05 11:02 PM by Hissyspit
to the best of my memory. Brown pushed the idea that this is a 'little' story and mainly that this is just a personal attack. After Brown saying that the White House doesn't necessarily know who gets credentials, Aravosis said "That's a bunch of hogwash." He said that anyway who doesn't think this White House isn't completely aware of who gets in, is fooling themselves. He then went on to emphasize that this is an important story because of the possible connections to the White House. He mentioned the Plame connection, too, I believe. He said that "Gannon" had invited the scrutiny himself in an online commentary. Sorry I don't have the exact transcript.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hector459 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Haven't we been told that Bush runs a "tight ship" major "discipline" etc
So you know damn well the WH knows exactly who is in that press room and who is going to be called upon and knows many of the questions beforehand. Especially when Bush is holding a conference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Oh absolutely.
It's fantastic to think they don't "know" him all of a sudden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wrinkle_In_Time Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. An exact transcript wasn't expected. Thanks for the summary...
... it's great that Aravosis got the Plame reference in. That's important (unlike Guckert having a gay escort site).

If people are persistent and lucky, maybe this will be the blow that opens up the entire, stinking piñata.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kinkistyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
30. Actually Eric Boehlert mentioned the "invitation"
John tried to keep all the "personal attacks" stuff in the background as much as possible and try and focus on the salient points. Brown tried to shift the discussion to a "scandal, personally attack, creepy blogger stalking" angle and Eric Boehlert from Salon mentioned that Gannon basically invited the investigation into his life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Nutshell...
Brown touted it as a 'little story' and started it all off with asking it it wasn't a bit "unseemly" to go after someone's personal life. Aravosis countered that Gannon himself posted a challenge to liberals to "bring it on and try to find out about me". Brown tried to neutralize the angle that Gannon got a press pass and Aravosis basically said "Are you kidding me? EVERYTHING is choreographed in that press room and the White House knows EXACTLY who is going in and what questions are being asked." Aravosis got in the point that Gannon was privy to otherwie confidential Plame papers, that he has been operating in the WH press room for 2 years...

Brown couldn't squirm out of the segment fast enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #13
41. I thought it was kind of "unseemly" to go after Clinton's personal life.
But that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlwaysDemocrat Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. Here's a link to the broadcast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Hey thanks AD, I linked it in the header too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. Here's my email to Aravosis:
JOHN -
Thank you, thank you, thank you for not letting Aaron Brown get away with his mainstream media shit. It was only a few seconds, but it was on CNN!
Hissyspit - www.democraticunderground.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. Great Clip.
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. Thanks I loath Aaron he's such an arrogant snot
I had an email exchange with him once the guy is so full of himself it's not funny.

It was good to see JOHN ARAVOSIS hand him his Ass. :toast:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. I wrote Aaron and tried to appeal to the "profession."
Edited on Fri Feb-11-05 12:31 AM by Clark2008
I am really a former journalist and this whole event - or series of events - sickens me. I really DO want to know why they're, in effect, defending Gannon even though he's nothing but a hack. I really DO want to know why they don't care about their profession.

Here's my letter:

Aaron,
Why are you guys not coming down harder on Jeff Gannon?
I just watched a web clip of your interview with John Aravosis. I realize you have to ask certain questions as Devil's advocate, but it seemed to me like you kept trying to spin the story toward the fact that "liberal" bloggers outted Gannon (in more ways than one) and how "horrid" that is. Personally, I don't care if the guy is queer as a three dollar bill and the issue isn't his sexual orientation.
The story is that:
A.) He worked for a phony media organization and was given credentials with a phony name in less than six days after the site was up and operational.
B.) His past business (not personal) dealings are so shady, I don't think I'd let him interview my dog catcher, much less step into the White House; and,
C.) The fact that this dubious fellow was given documents that outted a CIA agent.
Seriously, after seeing both you and Wolf Blitzer somewhat defend Gannon, all-be-it on the issue of his personal life, I'm beginning to wonder what's happening to the profession I once loved so much (am in public relations now - had to work more stable hours than that of a reporter upon the birth of my child).
Why aren't you guys OUTRAGED that someone would pull a stunt like this?
Aaron, I really don't think anyone is going to question your background (although, there are some "reporters" out there whose background might need it), so I don't think that you guys are scared to be next on the liberal blog chopping block. Besides, you didn't invite the blogosphere to "out" you, as Gannon did.
But, I do realize that, throughout the years, there have been many reporters who didn't attend J-School, but they did work themselves up through the ranks and learned the craft before considering themselves a reporter. This issue is of learned crediblity, whether that's through on-the-job training or journalism school. I didn't start out my journalism career asking President Clinton questions in the Rose Garden, did you?
This hack, Gannon, along with Armstrong Williams and Maggie Gallagher, are setting back the profession to depths it has never known in this country.
Seriously, doesn't it bother you guys that he is USING the good name of reporting to further his own specific goals?
It bothers me. No, actually, it sickens me. I'm disgusted that "reporters" would take my tax money to spin for ANYONE, no matter their political affiliation.

Regards,



Edited to add: I also had a back and forth e-mail with Aaron one day. I didn't find him arrogant, at all, really. He seemed pretty "Minnesotaish" to me. ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #28
44. Brown is better than most
But, when most are scum sucking bottom feeders, that doesn't say much.

However, Brown has given some snooty replies to DUers in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #44
49. Again, here is the pro-Brown interpretation link:
Edited on Fri Feb-11-05 10:48 AM by Hissyspit
I emailed Avatosis and congratulated him, but put Aaron Brown down. I wonder, though... He DID cover the story, and he DID let John get his comments in.

It got cut off pretty quickly, though.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=1586385&mesg_id=1586385
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petron Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
23. Send "NewsNight" a note
http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5.html?13

I asked him this:
"When was the last time you got to ask the president a question in the White House press room?"

I've heard it hear and now fully believe it: CNN is FoxLite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue northern Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. Thanks for the clip
Aaron Brown looked as much like a stooge and plant for *'s agenda as gannon/guckert.
I hope the momentum keeps up for this story.
This could be the turd that tips the shitwagon.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Welcome to DU and as far as your last sentence....
LMAO!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
27. Straight up props to John Avarosis!
He freakin' rules!

He totally dismissed Aaron's story and got the REAL story out on the table.

John's the one who, through his stopdrlaura.com website, spearheaded getting homophobic asshole Dr. Laura off television.

He really was awesome tonight. Aaron didn't quite know what to do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventythree Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. awesome he was!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kinkistyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
29. Wow! Must watch. John really hits the nail on the head!
He keeps the seamy, sex stuff to a minimum and just keeps hitting on the main key points: shady character gets WH Press Pass and CIA leaks. And he pounds on it. It also helped that he was joined by someone with at least half shred of decency in Boehlert and not some Repug talking head. Wonderful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
31. Wow! He slaps Brown's smug "so what" attitude right off his face.
Very powerful. Great job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
32. John kicked Aaron's Dismissive Ass all over the ROOM
That was sweet. Well...props to Aaron for at least COVERING the fucking thing. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Yes he sure did!
WTG John! :toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
34. God Damn, after watching that, I am convinced that they're all in on it
Aaron: "Well it does raise some questions...about media...about..."

Aaron, sir, it raises questions about treason, propaganda, the First Amendment, democracy and FUCKING REALITY.

Look, I have to tell you guys. I get sick of the petty bullshit in the media and the blogs and blah blah, sometimes -- but this is an IMPORTANT story. Something isn't right, here -- and for Aaron to "poo poo" it so vehemently, says a whole lot about this.

These are questions that NOBODY wants asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
35. Kicking for people who went to bed early to see when they get up in a.m.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
36. NOMINATE THIS FOR THE FRONT PAGE!!!
Democrats need to take their talking points from this guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bling bling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
38. If this doesn't shed light on what CNN really is, I don't know what will.
Red flags everywhere about this Gannon guy, White house paying off the media, link between Gannon reading CIA documents about Plame. Aravosis handed CNN a Lewinsky size story on a silver platter and Aaron Brown says, and I quote:

"Yes, it does raise questions and we'll leave it at that. (Tune in tomorrow for...)"

Another thing I noticed was when the Salon guy told Brown that Gannon worked under a fake name. Brown says..."I believe that's what you call a "pseudonym" in your industry, isn't it?"

Uh...Aaron, YOU'RE ON CNN. Wouldn't it be YOUR industry, too? Did Brown just reveal something about who he really is without meaning to, or did he just forget who he's supposed to be like the rest of the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. The Foxes Examining The Hen House
Did anyone expect CNNservative and Brown to do any different? I sure didn't. Yes, he tried to play like some alien...feigning that he didn't know how controlled this regime is or that they are unabashed in how they spin, manipulate and use others. Totally disengenuous.

The more this story is downplayed, ridiculed or ignored on CNNservative, it shows how serious this matter is. They were forced to do stories on it...and purposely chose to take this regime's side without any prompting. "Gannon" was given 10 minutes of prime time...without a serious question about his credentials or connections...and made to look like a martyr.

"Journalism" is not as sexy as being a "media star". Brown likes to fancy himself as a newsman, but only when it makes him or his bosses look good. If things look back, it's always attack the messenger.

Today will be a big day, to see if CNNservative attempts to try to bury this story once and for all...hoping, just like Armstrong Williams, the story will die due to lack of coverage over the weekend.

We'll know CNNservatives true stripes on Sunday when Whorie Kurtz does his TV treehouse. His coverage/non coverage of "Gannon" will summarize exactly what Rove had instructed this network to do to destroy this scandal. Be there...aloha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
39. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
40. I just woke up and watched it, amazing he was given time at all
Eloquent and persuasive, he nailed 'Error' Brown even after Brown tried to deflect it back at 'Liberals'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinayellowdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
43. Eric Boehlert is a prince!
Have been admiring his work for years now; his Rolling Stone analysis of press bias against Gore in 2000 was an eye-opener. It's good to see his face and hear his voice after reading him for so long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
45. Whatever happened to holding our politicians accountable?
That lead-in piece was a complete apologist job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jn2375 Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
46. We need to find a picture of Gannon wearing a hard press pass
several reporters have reported seeing him wearing what seemed to be one. Hunt for pictures!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #46
53. Or a dress. Couldn't resist. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
50. There's a vido clip? Where? I can't find it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #50
54. Scroll down to "John's appearance on CNN"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. Got it- thanks.
Downloading now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
51. Aaron Brown...how does he look at himself in the mirror? He tried soooo
hard to turn it into a personal issue, sexual issue, liberal persecution issue, etc... and they wouldn't go for it. What cowards these "journalists" are! Aaron Brown is disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #51
57. That was a low point for AB
Usually I respect the guy. That was just shameless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
52. You have to scroll down a bit to find the clip. BB,
thanks for the heads up on this. I would have missed it otherwise. Great that Aaron Brown, skeptical as he seemed, got a dressing down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
56. Transcript from Lexis Nexis
http://tinyurl.com/5ux64

SHOW: CNN NEWSNIGHT AARON BROWN 10:00 PM EST

February 10, 2005 Thursday


BROWN: We have a rule about using air quotes you know air quotes in the NEWSNIGHT office. We don't. But this story has tested the rule mightily. At its center is a so-called reporter for the Talon News Service, a website run by a Republican activist in Texas. The reporter and many people take issue with his use of that label resigned yesterday from covering the White House.

But the story is much more than that, so we begin with CNN's Tom Foreman.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

TOM FOREMAN, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): On the radio, on the Internet, on dozens of TV channels thousands of people call themselves journalists and that is raising a sticky question when it comes to access to the White House which ones should be treated like real reporters. Press Secretary Scott McClellan said today "When you have changing media, it's not an easy issue to decide or try to pick and choose who is a journalist. It gets into the issue of advocacy journalism, where do you draw the line?"

A question to the president by a conservative Internet reporter sparked the debate. Jeff Gannon of Talonnews.com took aim at Democratic Senators last month.

JEFF GANNON, TALONNEWS.COM: How are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?

FOREMAN: Liberal Web sites called Gannon a shill for conservative interests. Congressional Democrats asked why he was allowed into the press briefing. Gannon is defending himself.

GANNON: Well, Talon News is a legitimate conservative online news service and my questions are things that my readers, 700,000 daily subscribed readers, want the answer to.

FOREMAN: Still, under a torrent of what he calls unfair Internet assaults on his personal life and threats against his family, Gannon has resigned from Talon News and even White House reporters who like him say that's for the best.

BOB DEANS, WHITE HOUSE REPORTEER, COX NEWSPAPERS: The public has a hard time right now discerning who to trust with the news.

FOREMAN: Bob Deans is the former president of the White House Correspondents Association.

DEANS: They ought to be able to know that we are who we say we are. We don't have a political axe to grind and we're going to deliver the news straight up and that if we don't our editors are going to yank us out of there.

FOREMAN (on camera): Getting a permanent press pass at the White House is difficult. Generally only big news organizations can do it but daily press passes are handed out to almost anyone in the media who passes a basic security test. That is how Jeff Gannon got inside for two years.

(voice-over): And although he is now gone, White House journalists say others with clearly political points of view remain while the White House says it's not the administration's job to decide who is or is not a legitimate journalist.

Tom Foreman, CNN, Washington.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

BROWN: As we said this odd little story covers a lot of ground and raises a good many issues.

We're joined from Washington tonight by John Aravosis, one of the bloggers who has been fueling the story. He writes for America Blog, a Democratic political consultant as well, also joining us here in New York Eric Boehlert a senior writer and media critic for Salon, good to have you both.

John, there is I think here a kind of so what quality. Here is this guy. Everyone knows what he is. The only people honestly who read the website are people who believe what he believes to begin with so why the fuss?

JOHN ARAVOSIS, AMERICABLOG.ORG: Aaron, I think the fuss isn't about this guy being a conservative because I think the point's been made there's a lot of conservatives, a lot of liberals in the press corps.

The point is this guy has a rather fishy background that the bloggers over the last couple of weeks at dailycoast.com and also myamericablog.org have found out that, you know, this guy's business experiences go back to dealing with some rather sort of shady Web sites a year or two before he was in the White House.

He sets up his Talon News Service on April 29th, I believe, of 2003. Six days later he's getting a White House pass to get in and ask questions of the president.

We then find out just a few months later that this journalist, who just pops up out of nowhere, is getting CIA documents in the Valeria Plame affair, which was the CIA agent that was outed with regards to the WMD and all of that.

It's just the larger question here for me isn't so what about this guy, is he a journalist or not but how did somebody get this kind of access to the White House and this kind of CIA information? I think the White House is behind this.

BROWN: Let's come back to that.

Eric, is there something a little unseemly about the way -- the way people went at this guy's personal life? I mean this was about ultimately partisan differences, political differences and they went at his personal life.

ERIC BOEHLERT, SALON MEDIA CRITIC: Right and, you know, and I think that's something the bloggers were obviously behind and at Salon that's not what we focused on. We focused on -- we talked about what was the relationship between him and the White House? How did he get this access? But, you know, he was writing under a fake name. There's not many people in the press White House writing under a fake name. He was very mysterious about it.

BROWN: I think they call that a pseudonym in your business don't they?

BOEHLERT: You pick it, alias or whatever.

BROWN: Yes.

BOEHLERT: Not many people going to the press office writing under someone else's name.

BROWN: Right.

BOEHLERT: Sort of mysterious about his past and then so people started digging into both his past and his news agency and a couple of days ago he posted this sort of aggressive essay on his website saying "I'm hiding in plain sight." You know, come after me if you want to find out who I am and people did.

BROWN: So, he did a sort of Gary Hart?

BOEHLERT: In a way, yes. I mean he wrote an essay, "I'm hiding in plain sight. Any of you liberals who want to find out who I am, you know, start digging. There's nothing to find." Well, there was something to find. But, again, I think it's more interesting how did he get this access and, you know, it seems like the rules were bent at the White House to give a partisan a front row seat in the press room.

BROWN: Well, here's what, I mean what a job at the White House says is they don't really ask about your political affiliation on these daily passes. The correspondent corps doesn't pass judgment here. If you show an ID and you pass a Secret Service check then you get to sit there and if your number is drawn, you get to ask a question.

ARAVOSIS: That is the biggest bunch of hogwash I've ever heard.

BROWN: Oh, OK.

ARAVOSIS: George Bush's White House controls everything that happens every second of the day and anybody that thinks that that White House doesn't know everyone walking in the door, they threw out Sara, I forget her name, I want to say McClanahan (ph).

BROWN: Sara McClendon.

ARAVOSIS: Sara McClendon. She got thrown out for three months in 2001 because they didn't like the questions she was asking and she was told for security reasons this 90-year-old reporter couldn't come into the White House.

They absolutely decide who does and doesn't come in that door. If you ask the wrong questions, they punish you. And for them to now suggest that some guy who had a shady business background, we're not talking about his personal life, we're talking about his business life, he told Wolf Blitzer earlier today that he was hired to construct some Web sites that basically the web addresses dealt with escort services.

BROWN: Yes.

ARAVOSIS: We'll leave it at that. I think that that raises enough of a red flag that at least you wonder if this man should be meeting with the president of the United States and getting CIA documents. That's all we're saying.

BROWN: Got it.

ARAVOSIS: This isn't personal. It's important.

BROWN: OK. Well, OK.

BOEHLERT: And the way it works in Washington, if you want to cover the White House, first you go to Capitol Hill. That's the first stop. You have to get credentials for Capitol Hill.

ARAVOSIS: Right.

BOEHLERT: And then if you want a hard pass, a permanent pass to the White House, you go to the White House. You fill out an application and then the Secret Service does a background check. If you don't have Capitol Hill credentials, the White House won't even submit your application.

BROWN: For a hard pass.

BOEHLERT: Yes. Jeff Gannon went to Capitol Hill. They said "You're not a real reporter. This is not a real news organization."

ARAVOSIS: Right.

BOEHLERT: And then he spends two years in the White House Press Office getting his daily passes.

ARAVOSIS: How did he get -- how did he get to ask the president a question two weeks ago? I mean, Eric you know and Aaron you know as well, you don't just get to ask the president a question. That's planned in advance. These guys, there's something else going on here.

This isn't just some journalist who happened to get in and happened to get a pass. They wanted him there. They scripted this and I'm frankly wondering again how did he get involved with Valerie Plame?

It's just there are some unanswered questions here higher up of somebody in the White House and it brings us to the larger question of Armstrong Williams and everything else as far as the whole propaganda White House.

BROWN: We'll leave it at that. It does raise lots of questions on having to do with media, having to do with what's appropriate and, in fact, having to do with the White House and how it operates, good to see you both tonight. Thank you for coming in tonight.

ARAVOSIS: Thank you.

BOEHLERT: Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. THANK you for that!
I want to email that around a bit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursacorwin Donating Member (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #56
64. i noticed this part:
dailycoast.com and also myamericablog.org

is that the fault of the typist or the transcript?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. I think they use voice recognition software for the transcripts
Thus, Kos, sounds like Coast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
58. I saw it last night...he ran circles around Brown!
He was on fire! An ovation is right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
60. Wow - he nailed it.
Awesome to watch! What a good Friday this is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
61. Kicked & Rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
62. Now Aravosis has posted '12 Questions for Gannon/Guckert'
go to his ameriblog.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. Thanks, Hissyspit, I'm on the way to check it out!
:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
63. I think Aaron Did a good job on it
I know, I know, he is just another biased reporter to many of you. However, keep in mind he didn't have someone on the right to balance this so if anything I honestly think he was being unfair to republicans. As a news anchor he does have to provide some balance so he might not always seem 'fair' himself even if the segement itself is fair.

I watched the segment last night and it was great; I'm proud of our bloggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. "As a news anchor he does have to provide some balance"
Is that true? If someone has committed a crime, for instance, the news anchor doesn't have to provide the 'balanced' view of the criminal. This shouldn't be a partisan issue, after all. If the man was credentialed improperly, if Bush and Rove handpicked him to toss softball questions, wouldn't a Repbulican shun those tactics?

I don't think it's always necessary to provide counterpoint every time, heaven knows we've been on the short end of "fair and balanced" reporting a time or two!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slutticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
69. Fantastic!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC