Malloy Is Connecting The Dots Right Now.....

[global1]

we need to get this dot connecting out to the masses.

[Sydnie]

1. well, do tell. What is he saying? n/t

[lala_rawraw]

3. PRINT, COPY, PASS

EVERY ARTICLE THAT THE TV DOES NOT COVER. We have to bypass the prop by the TV.

[WLKjr]

4. actually we should carry portable video devices

and show video of dumbass speaking one thing and doing the exact opposite.

[mzmolly]

2. Which dots?

:hi:

[RBHam]

5. These dots...

I connected them on September 11th...

It seems to take others longer...

Rice testifies before 9/11 commission: more cover-up and lies
By Barry Grey

Thursday’s hearing of the national commission to investigate 9/11, which took testimony from Bush’s national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, was a bipartisan exercise in cover-up and duplicity. It was all the more grotesque, occurring as it did against the backdrop of US war crimes in Fallujah and other Iraqi cities that have already taken thousands of civilian lives, and led to more deaths and injuries of American soldiers who have been fed a non-stop diet of lies by those in Washington who authored the colonial enterprise.

That Rice could claim, “Today, along with many allies, we are helping the people of Iraq and Afghanistan to build free societies...to spread the blessings of liberty and democracy as alternatives to instability and terror,” without being challenged by a single member of the commission—Democratic or Republican—points to the real purpose of the commission. Its primary political task is to conceal from the American people the connection between the tragedy of September 11, 2001 and US imperialist policy in general, and the conspiracy hatched by the Bush administration to invade and occupy Iraq and seize its oil resources, in particular.

With the US government engaged in murderous actions that are inflaming public opinion throughout the Muslim and Arab world, Rice’s contention that the “war on terror” is staunching the growth of Islamist terrorism and enhancing the safety and security of ordinary Americans would be laughable, were not its implications so catastrophic.

The real question before the commission is not some “intelligence failure” prior to 9/11, but to what extent the Bush administration and top-level figures in the intelligence and military establishment pursued a deliberate policy of allowing a hijacking to occur, in order to create the pretext for implementing a pre-existing agenda of using military force to establish US imperialist hegemony in the oil-rich Persian Gulf and Caspian regions.

More dots connected...

http://www.wsws.org/articles/testdir/apr2004/rice-a09.shtml

[mzmolly]

6. Ahhhhhhh, thanks!

:hi: