Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House seeks ban on Religious Tea

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
disillusioned1 Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:33 PM
Original message
White House seeks ban on Religious Tea
Thursday, February 10, 2005 · Last updated 3:03 p.m. PT

White House seeks ban on religious tea

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to block a New Mexico church from using hallucinogenic tea that the government contends is illegal and potentially dangerous.

The appeal from Attorney General Alberto Gonzales argues that a lower court was wrong to allow the Brazil-based O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao do Vegetal to import and use the hoasca tea as part of its religious services.

"The court's decision has mandated that the federal government open the nation's borders to the importation, circulation and usage of a mind-altering hallucinogen and threatens to inflict irreparable harm on international cooperation in combating transnational narcotics trafficking," the filing states.

The church, which has about 140 members in the United States and 8,000 worldwide, said the herbal brew is a central sacrament in its religious practice, which is a blend of Christian beliefs and traditions rooted in the Amazon basin.

...

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apwashington_story.asp?category=1151&slug=Scotus%20Religious%20Tea

Don't they know? It's illegal if the CIA didn't think of it first!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. But all fundies want religious freedom, don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Freedom to force everyone to be a born again
Christian is what they mean by freedom. And by separation of church and state, they mean separation of every-church-but-theirs and state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Okay, then we need to make the Neocon Kool-Aid a Schedule 1 drug,
since we're cracking down on mind-altering substances.

Oh, I'm sorry, you're right: the Kool-Aid is a mind *alleviating* substance.

Never mind.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. If only it was Johnstown style Kool-Aid©
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disillusioned1 Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. BWAHAHAHA
Thanks, I knew if I posted this stupid piece, someone here would make me laugh. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. RW Talk Radio fits in that category
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ah the timeless argument of tyranny.
We should ignore the constitution because it interferes with what the government wants to do.

I love it when they just spell it out like that, no bullshit, they just argue to a court that the government should just get to do whatever they want, and the court just says ok.

The beauty of american politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCeline69 Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. Here's what we do
Dress up like Amazonian natives and dump the tea in Boston Harbor.
So, is this hoasca anything like ayahuasca? (Er, not that I would know anything about that)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wouldn't you think that the new Atty General...
would have something better to do than harass 140 church-going people in New Mexico????????

Of all the things on the plate of the country's top crime fighter, THIS is his top priority??????

Grrrrrrrrrr......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Charon Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. Religious Ban
Don't think this is the first time the Govt has attempted to proscribe certain religious practices. Believe back in the late 60's
a move to outlaw the use of peyote by some Native American religious groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xpat Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. Has the law changed?
When I was in college we mail-ordered peyote from some guy in Texas. It was legal, since Southwest Indians use it in their religious services.

We also picked up some signs from a religious paraphenalia outlet. They said, "Divine service held here daily". We got the address from the "East Village Other", a great newspaper that has probably since disappeared.

The "Other" ran a cartoon that I think of every time I recite the Pledge of Allegiance. Imagine Uncle Sam bent over a table wearing nothing but his iconic hat. Bent over buggering him is that fellow who reaches out to touch Adam's finger on the Sistine Chapel ceiling. The caption is "One nation under God".

My wife couldn't handle the divine service sign, so I have been reduced to hanging Giotto's "Annunciation" over the bed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hnsez Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
12. But W.H. Press Releases are a "mind-altering hallucinogen"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheepyMcSheepster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
13. so they gonna outlaw fundy snake handling?
seems pretty dangerous to me?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
14. Of all the fricking nerve.
It's okay to be a fundamentalist on megadoses of Valium, but NOT okay for these people to pursue their freedom of religion?

Hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC