Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"It's IMPOSSIBLE to get a WH pass using an alias"...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:54 PM
Original message
"It's IMPOSSIBLE to get a WH pass using an alias"...
Having worked in the White House, I can assure everyone that not only would it be impossible to get a White House pass using an alias, it is impossible even to get past the gate for an appointment using an alias. Thorough FBI background checks are required for the former and a picture ID is necessary for the latter. Therefore, if Gannon was using an alias, White House staff had to be involved in maintaining his cover.

-Bruce Bartlett
http://poynter.org/forum/?id=letters

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's impossible if you only give an alias
He obviously had to give his real name to security. Someone had to greenlight not only his acceptance but also the use of his alias. This is a smoking gun. The top had to know what he was and had to be at least supportive of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewInNewJ. Donating Member (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Scottie
said he used his real name for the pass. What I want to know, if Scottie knew his real name, why did Scottie use his fake name when he call on him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Bush also called on him as Jeff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drummer55 Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. is there vid or audio of this? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmkinsey Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Yes
It was on Olberman. Scotty called on "Jeff" regularly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
centristo Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. because
James Guckert is his real name and was the name on his driver's license which he gave to security, allegedly.

Jeff Gannon is his so-called professional name. I think in media and show business this is relatively common and not a huge cause for alarm. However, there clearly seems to be some complicity by the WH in letting this shady character into the Press Briefing. Scott McClellans' explanation was REALLY weak too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Apparently he had several "Professions"....
Too bad he didn't use a different name for each one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. So his name tag says "Jeff Gannon" but his personal idea say "Guckert"...
and he is not stopped by SS!? Please rethink your position. It is untenable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. Yeah, right!!!
I'd say it's a name to use so your background check, if they bother to do one, doesn't show you owe back taxes from 96.

Professional name??? Gimme a break--Jeffie came into existence four days after the creation of TALON news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
25. Incorrect.
Female reporters are not allowed to use their maiden names on WH press passes even if they use their maiden names for professional purposes.

Aliases are NOT allowed on WH press passes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventythree Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. what the heck is that about
since a maiden name is not an alias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. I'm not sure; it's the law but I dunno why for.
Because SS clearance needs the married name? Is the married name still considered the only "legal" name once you are married, in the USA?

Maybe because checking under someone's maiden name would only give details up until the date they were married, so if you wed 10 years ago there'd be nothing on you since then?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventythree Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. I can see asking for it, but
requiring it to be used on a pass when you don't use it professionally, is something else. Actually, one's legal name is any name one chooses to use as long as it is not used to defraud. Many security apps will ask maiden and married and any other name ever used, like if you were married before, it was the thought that they required you to put a name you don't use on an ID that got me -- kind of like Reagan not allowing women to wear pants in the WH -- a throw back to 1950.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. I know nothing about this but wouldn't a name appear on the
day pass?

If that's true there's physical evidence of what transpired.

If the pass had Guckert...and McClellan used "Gannon" MC is in on it.

If the pass had Gannon on it, someone approved putting an alias on the pass.

I am guessing some member of the White House Correspondents Association knows the answer to these mysteries.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. They just said to watch for the guy wearing the blue dress. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. The republicans love phony actors as politicians.
It won't faze them a bit that we have phony reporters.

The only ones outraged by these crimes will be the true Americans that see their Nation sliding into the abyss of plutocracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. The fact that the rw is defending this guy is an outrage
Can you imagine what the media would be doing if this guy was a progressive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
centristo Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. its not an outrage
its laughable. I'm not outrages by these guys anymore. Everything they seem to do is so unbelievable its beyond me. There are some threads at FR that are just ludicrous. Why they rush to defend anyone the perceived liberal MSM busts on, regardless of the crime or the guilt, is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. The documented ROVE-NIXON connection to dirty tricks.
Edited on Fri Feb-11-05 01:40 PM by Lex
.
http://www.lacitybeat.com/article.php?id=1316&IssueNum=72

"At 21, Rove dropped out of college and into politics, and became an early protégé of convicted Watergate player Don Segretti – the political operative who invented the term “ratfucking” in the first place. In that same tradition, Rove has been linked to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, attacks on John McCain’s mental health, and, back in Texas, the whispering that Democratic Governor Ann Richards was a lesbian. Rove remains, for many, a prime suspect in the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame, and even Republicans tend to reinforce his image as Bush’s Dark Lord. “He dominates a campaign,” Republican strategist David Weeks told The Washington Post. “Nothing ever happens that he’s not aware of.”"

--------

Everything that's old is new again.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Hey, Lex. I added an intro to your Gannon-Rove-Nixon original post...
Jeff Gannon was acting like one of Nixon's "Rat Fuckers" (Democ-RAT Fuckers). He is probably connected to Karl Rove - seems like one of Rove's tricks - but that is the big question. Here is how Rove is connected to the Nixon people - Don Segretti. Boomers, remember that name from your childhood (Watergate coverage)?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=3091072#

Lex (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-11-05 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #16

18. Found it! Rove's connections to Nixon's ratfuckers!

Edited on Fri Feb-11-05 02:25 AM by Lex
.
"At 21, Rove dropped out of college and into politics, and became an early protégé of convicted Watergate player Don Segretti – the political operative who invented the term “ratfucking” in the first place. In that same tradition, Rove has been linked to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, attacks on John McCain’s mental health, and, back in Texas, the whispering that Democratic Governor Ann Richards was a lesbian. Rove remains, for many, a prime suspect in the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame, and even Republicans tend to reinforce his image as Bush’s Dark Lord. “He dominates a campaign,” Republican strategist David Weeks told The Washington Post. “Nothing ever happens that he’s not aware of.”"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio-Active Donating Member (735 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. Gannon's excuse for the alias -
was "Jeff Gannon" is easier to pronounce" YEAAAAHHH RIGHT!!

If the problem was that Guckert is difficult to pronounce, why did he change his first name also?

By that logic, he should've gone by "James Gannon" since "James" isn't difficult to pronounce. Nope, he's hiding something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Jim Miklashevski
NBC's Pentagon reporter.

Is that harder than Guckert?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrat 4 Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I read somewhere that alias weren't allowed on the WH IDs
Even the day passes. The point was made with some of the better known female correspondents using their better known (often maiden) name for their credentials. The deal was they weren't allowed to use their professional name but had to get clearance and their ID showing their actual married name for "security reasons." Would love to see what name Mrs. Alan Greenspan has on her ID. Does anyone know if this is true? Just remember that it was a big deal for some of the women to have to use a pass with a name they didn't use professionally.

So I think the "professional" name excuse for Gannon is hog wash. He was a plant, pure and simple. SnottyScotty, GeorgyPorgy and every body else in between knows that is complete and utter BS. And that the idiot who can't even remember the major points of his own damn Social Security reform proposal can remember the name of a "Day Pass Wonk" posing as a journalist? Yeah, right. :puke: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #17
29. This I don't understand
I have never gone by my husband's name for a single day of the 35 years we've been married. Are you saying that if I were a reporter, I'd be required to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #17
31. Correct. And guess WHO you must write to to get a WH press pass...
Female reporters, who use their maiden name professionally, are given credentials with their married name and aren't allowed to be credentialed under their maiden names.

And if ya wanna join the WH press gaggle, here's whatcha do;

1. Ignore this:

"I don't think it's the role of the press secretary to get into the business of being a media critic or picking and choosing who gets credentials," said McClellan

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/nation/columns/kurtzhoward/

2. Write on official letterhead:

Your real name, address, Social Security number, date of birth, and news affiliation.

3. Mail to:

Scott McClellan
Assistant to the President/Press Secretary
Office of the Press Secretary
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest
Room #WH/1/WW
Washington, D.C. 20500

heh. They're ALL a bunch of total f*cking LIARS.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventythree Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. like yah
he was hiding the fact that he was involved in M4M
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. Ummmmm. Apparently not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. 1000% correct.
As somebody who works with law enforcement on a daily basis, I can tell you that they (law enforcement) can run you (obtain your criminal and dmv history) in a matter of minutes. The criminal history (CLETS) printout contains every alias you've ever used, whether you've ever been arrested or not. An absence of entry strongly implies a change of identity, hence suspicion of a concealed criminal history, sometimes leading to an extreme response. But they would never say, "okie doke. Nothing here. Guess he's clean."

This dude would be smoked out in seconds and have 10 glocks pointing at his head if S. McClellan were telling the truth. They let him in knowing who he really was.

Gyre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventythree Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. Yah, but he gave his correct name
so there wouldn't be a glitch in the criminal stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
22. It's just not the alias
although the alias is suspicious. The fact that "Jeff Gannon" was granted a White House pass when he was working for a news service that was only six days old is enough to know that the administration was in on the whole deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
23. The HARD PASS...a THEORY
Ya know, there are "hard" press passes, and there are "HARD" White House passes...much like there are hard press passes for the Pentagon, day passes to the PGon press room, and day passes (with/without escort) AND hard passes for those who are workers (renewal is based on when you PCS, scheduled timeframes for civ workers), or who are contractors on a six-month or more job. It's an ID, with name/photo/expiration--plain and easy to see.

The lamestream media, and Slaughter and Lautenberg, might be well advised to ask if Jimmy Jeff was issued any OTHER kind of White House pass. Don't limit the questioning to the press room alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
24. That's why they want to cover this up...they know it connects them
to him. There's no way cowardly Bush would allow anybody near him without uber scrutiny. They don't just know these folks' general identities, they put together dossiers on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventythree Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. great point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC