Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lynne Stewart conviction

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 02:09 PM
Original message
Lynne Stewart conviction
Edited on Fri Feb-11-05 02:11 PM by pberq
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/11/1545229

This is about bigger things than Lynne Stewart. First, the adminstration wants to scare off lawyers from defending so-called "terrorists" lest they get at the truth of government complicity in 9/11 and other events.

Second, it's about keeping the ongoing war crimes under cover. Here is a quote by Lynne Stewart's lawyer:

MICHAEL TIGAR: ". . .The only way that we will ever get to the bottom of the American concentration camp abuses at Gitmo and Abu Ghraib is that if the lawyers for these prisoners are permitted to tell their stories to the world. If the government can shut off that communication, which they have attempted to do over and over and over again, these activities will continue in secret, blessed as they are by the highest officials of government in a country which has for the first time in its history given a cabinet job to a fellow who says that the Geneva Convention is obsolete and that the torture memo doesn’t mean anything."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Finally someone calls them what they are:
Concentration camps.

This story is one of the most disturbing I've heard yet: putting lawyers who defend "terrorists" in jail -- I'd be shocked and outraged if I wasn't already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Indeed. A transparent prosecution of justice
would be the most respected. Continued secrecy will only breed mistrust and contempt. I think a long time ago, "winning hearts and minds" was said to be a goal in the WOT.
They have clearly given up on that goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Government repression
Then you must also support government repression of truth within this country.

See this for a description of the case:
http://www.socialism.com/fsarticles/vol25no4/stewart.html

<snip>
For years, the government has been spying on New York attorney Lynne Stewart — to such an extent that civil liberties defenders say the Department of Justice ought to be arrested and tried for its actions. Instead, it is Lynne Stewart who is on trial, in a courtroom battle that pits the political Left against the far Right, the Constitution against the Attorney General, and the liberty-loving U.S. public against an empire determined to repress its critics and dump due process.

And this is a transcript of a portion of the trial in which Stewart's attorney exposes the fraudulent charges the government made against Stewart:
http://www.lynnestewart.org/rule29.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC