|
The truth is out. The real question is can people withstand it. It took me three years and I tend to be open minded. So I honestly don't know. The reality is that there is only so much truth any one mind can hold, beyond that is madness. Democracy is a religion and it has its own gods and monsters. Imagine if the body of Christ was found in the basement of the Vatican (there is a book I read years ago, cannot remember its name...this very topic). How would people react? Some would lose their minds. Some would become the antithesis of that which they believed in. Some would simply die. I think this is what will and is happening to people in this country. Example of madness: Rapture-mania/Bush anti-Christ. Example of the metamorphosis into the opposite: Pro-Life = more poor, war, execution, etc. Example of how a person dies: suicide at ground zero; suicide pacts, etc.
Rabbi Akiba Ben Joseph had some really great paradigms by which to illustrate this point. I don't know how to put them down out of context, but Google him. There is an especially potent one where 3 students see truth (this is a summary, out of context, and in English... so please do look it up): one was very religious and he became an atheist; one was a rationalist and he went mad; and one was ebullient with life and he killed himself.
So I think it is not so much that the truth is not out, rather it is that people are not ready for it and some will never be. I think Crossing the Rubicon pretty much answered all of my questions very well. In fact, I was doing research on my own and minus the classified stuff and access to spooks; I was coming up with the usual suspects, reasons, and actions. I was having trouble putting my pieces together (for myself, not for publication). Rubicon filled in the blanks.
I remember the reaction of people in the audience with me as we watched Moore’s F9/11. People walked out. People were crying. People had some sort of religious conversion in the theater. Others screamed “lie” at various portions. I had read Craig Unger’s book and I had read several similar types of research papers, historical documents and such. I was shocked to find out about the Fox News cousin (even though I may have read it, I did not remember it at all). So for me it was like watching a social experiment. People not aware of the history (and Moore left a great deal out) were unable to handle even that much of it. Now what if Moore actually went into other facts of 9/11: war games going on the same day, 9-11 (still cannot find the correct figure) simulating the hijacking of airliners. He left out the ready-made command center that NYC had set up at Port and at building #7. Moore left out FEMA on the ground on 9/10. Moore left out that the White House was on Cipro for a month prior. Moore left out all of the NORAD stuff. Moore also left out the insider trading (I worked on Wall Street, for Nasdaq and people thought something was going on at NYSE and the Chicago market, something very strange to be sure) that occurred 48 hours prior, more so 24 hours prior. It was not chump change. There is much more that he left out. Given what he included and the hysteria of the masses one can only imagine the meltdown if the full known facts were displayed.
3:00 AM… I should really stop responding to posts so late at night. I end up writing garbled versions of my thoughts and bore everyone to tears with the length of my response. Off to sleepppppppppppppp:D
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(800 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
