Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scottie did know that Gannons name was Guckert

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Riding this Donkey Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:52 PM
Original message
Scottie did know that Gannons name was Guckert
Jeff Gannon. How did he get a White House pass, or what kind of credentials did he have?

MR. McCLELLAN: Just like anyone else who comes to the White House.

Q Hard pass?

MR. McCLELLAN: No, he had never applied for a hard pass. He had a daily pass. I think he's been coming for --

Q Was he coming for --

MR. McCLELLAN: Hang on. I think he's been coming for more than two years now.

Q Under what name?

MR. McCLELLAN: Sorry?

Q Under what name?

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, you have to get cleared. You have to -- just like anybody else that comes to the White House, you have to have your full name, your Social Security number and your birth date. So you have to be cleared just like anybody else.

Q So he was being cleared under James Guckert, or whatever his name is?

MR. McCLELLAN: My understanding, yes.

Q Okay, and how did he get picked to get a question asked at the last news conference?

MR. McCLELLAN: He didn't. The President didn't have a list. The President didn't -- he was in the briefing room. There are assigned seats in the briefing room. We didn't do any assigning of seats, and the President worked his way through the rows, and called on people as he came to them. He doesn't know who he is.

Q Were you aware that he had another name?

MR. McCLELLAN: Was I aware? I had heard that. I had heard that, yes, recently.

Q But did you know during all this time that he really wasn't Jeff Gannon?

MR. McCLELLAN: I heard at some point, yes -- previously.

Q As Press Secretary, what do you think about this whole --

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, like I said -- what do I think about it? Well, let me explain a few things. First, as the press secretary, I don't think it's the role of the Press Secretary to get into picking or choosing who gets press credentials. Also, I don't think it's the role of the Press Secretary to get into being a media critic, and I think there are very good reasons for that. I've never inserted myself into the process. He, like anyone else, showed that he was representing a news organization that published regularly, and so he was cleared two years ago to receive daily passes, just like many others are. The issue comes up -- it becomes, in this day and age, when you have a changing media, it's not an easy issue to decide or try to pick and choose who is a journalist. And there -- it gets into the issue of advocacy journalism. Where do you draw the line? There are a number of people who cross that line in the briefing room.

And, as far as I'm concerned, I would welcome the White House Correspondents Association, if they have any concerns or issues that they want to bring to my attention, they know my door is open and I'll be glad to discuss these issues with them. I have an open dialogue with the Correspondents Association. No one's ever brought such an issue to my attention, in my -- during my time as being Press Secretary. And you all cover the briefing room on a regular basis. You know that there are a number of people in that room that express their points of view, and there are people in that room that represent traditional media, they represent talk radio, they represent -- they're columnists, and they represent online news organizations.

Q Was the White House aware at all -- was the White House aware -- was the White House aware at all about the online websites that he was linked to?

MR. McCLELLAN: No. This has only come to my attention through the news reports, just a few reporters calling in.

Q But just to make it clear, the only criteria, from the White House perspective is, someone can pass the Secret Service background check

MR. McCLELLAN: No, no, that's not -- first of all, I don't involve myself in that process, it's handled at a staff level. Like I said, if the White House Correspondents Association ever wants to talk about issues, I welcome that. But it becomes an issue -- it becomes an issue of where do you draw the line? Do you draw the line at advocacy journalism because there are a number of people that crossed that line, as I said? But there's hard -- there's hard passes and there's daily passes, as you are well aware. For a hard pass, you have to have a House and Senate credential, you have to regularly cover the White House, you have to apply for it, you have to go through a detailed FBI background check.

My understanding was, when he started coming to the White House about two years ago, the staff asked to see that it -- that he represented a news organization that published regularly. And they showed that, so he was cleared and has been cleared ever since based on that time.

And this is just now something that's come to my attention more recently because it's been an issue raised in some media reports.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050210-6.html#4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Was he coming?
Um... is that a trick question;)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riding this Donkey Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. for two years!
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think they knew the tax evasion stuff would come up.
They knew he was going to be lobbing softballs at Bush, even the "divorced themselves from reality" quote made the Daily Show, even before the scandal happened. So they knew us libruls would hear this asshole's name and pop it into google and who knows what would come up.

So, they said, let's just use that other name he goes by.

Oopsie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riding this Donkey Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. very possible n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. everytime i see gannon, i can only think of 3 words
right said fred
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. lol.. even the attitude is a match. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why have hard passes and day passes when "reporters" can come for
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 06:00 PM by AP
two years straignt with a new day pass every day (presuming he was there as much as any other reporter with a hard pass over the two year period)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riding this Donkey Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Good Question! How and Why????
These perps are really hard up aren't they. They gotta control the media to control the peeps.

They dont have ideas, they only have propaganda and scare tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wouldn't they have a log of what days he signed in? FOIA? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riding this Donkey Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I am convinced that he actually had hard pass, not a daily
Although I cannot prove it.

But Dana Milbank said he had what appeared to be a hard pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yeah but I thought Milbank
said the hard pass could've been a different kind, one that lets one go in and around the White House, like the White House gardeners etc. They weren't sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. I have a question about this:
If Gannon was cleared under his own name, why did Scottie call him Jeff? James would have been on his list of reporters that were present at any press conference.

Q Under what name?

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, you have to get cleared. You have to -- just like anybody else that comes to the White House, you have to have your full name, your Social Security number and your birth date. So you have to be cleared just like anybody else.

Q So he was being cleared under James Guckert, or whatever his name is?

MR. McCLELLAN: My understanding, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riding this Donkey Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. There in lies the rub and now today
he says he didn't know his name was guckert, but yesterday or the day before he did.

he's been caught!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC