Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which is worse? Trolling for Johns in the White House or

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 05:36 PM
Original message
Which is worse? Trolling for Johns in the White House or
"Renting the Lincoln Bedroom"

Republicans have "sold" a lot of Americans on the idea that democrats
are amoral people.. They squealed like stuck piggies about the "White House Coffees" and the "renting of the Lincoln Bedroom" ......the pardons..the "faux/unphotographed trashing" of the white house, and the thefts of Air Force One property, and the removal of furniture from the white house... and of course "the case of the missing "w"s" from the computer keyboards.

So MANY scandals.....and the volume was cranked up to EARDRUM SPLITTING day in and day out.. None of these "scandals" proved to be anything but propaganda, yet their refutations rarely appeared in the press, and we still hear them repeated as fact from time to time.

We saw them blocking traffic and chanting in front of a house that Al Gore had every legal right to live in...we saw them "storming the Bastille" trying to stop votes from being counted....


The press never missed an opportunity to glamorize the republican quest for decency. They were the quixotic, neatly pressed,squeaky clean youngsters out to return the country to innocence, modesty, godliness and "truth, justice and the American way".

Instead of portraying them as the greedy, OLD-moneyed, fat-cat corporatist party they really are, republicans are usually shown as "youthful", "eager", "helpful"..and a plethora of other adjectives. They are shown this way because the rich old greedy ones know what "sells".. Youth and enthusiasm are appealing across the board, and they are also easier to indoctrinate. Cults do most of their recruiting in colleges and on the streets where Young people congregate.

So now, one of their "inner circle", a guy who has been to Crawford with the Pres, probably on AF One too, Scotty's face lights up when he calls on him... He may not have slept in the Lincoln Bedroom, but then again.......hmmmm..

What media outlet is keeping track of who sleeps in the Lincoln bedroom these days? Is it only pertinent in a democratic administration? Of course *² spends as little time as possible there, so maybe the sleepovers don't even happen anymore. Coukd THAT be when Scotty & his friends :use: the place??:evilgrin:.. Maybe Jeffie HAS partied in the Lincoln Bedroom after all..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dinggggg, "Quixotic" the word is..."Quixotic"...
When republicans protest it's "Moral outrage" or they're "Concerned citizens". When Democrats protest it's "Uppity Hippies stinking up main street" or "Treehugging Wusses inconveniencing everyone over something nobody cares about".

The antiwar protest was given a bad name in the 60's. A stigma that will follow liberals for years to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. yep..those words.. concern.. worry...
their speech pattern always allows for "soft accusations" by using the "gentle, worry-words".. They ooze compassion just as an adder oozes venom from his fang... It's deadly, but by the time you realize it....it's too late:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. In the first year and a half
Bush hosted 160 overnighters in the WH. http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/08/17/whitehouse.sleepovers/

but that was different. Those were all "close family members and friends."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. "close friends"
Oh the images that run through my head ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Did I say "close"?
Sorry, I meant bald.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. that's even grosser, now they're into incest.
yuck.

from military scenes to kissing cousins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Hey now wait a minute
The US is the only western country that prohibits cousin marriages, and even then it's legal in most states. Cousins isn't incest. I got schooled in that a couple years ago, thanks to an online debate. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Exactly.. I would imagine that the Clintons were friendly
with their guests too, but it was always spun as fundraisers.. The ultimate fundraiser is *², yet no one dares to comment on it :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Slumber parties?
Why am I picturing Bush in a pair of Dr. D's, with the feet and the flap in the back.

Oh, that's just disturbing.

And trolling for John's?!

Run K/E! Run!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. side note: I love, and I do mean love, you sig picture!
Perfect! Absolutely perfect!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thanks.. I wish I knew more about graphics
I had to copy to Print Master then edit and copy to Irfan...shrink and then upload to my site.. In the process it got "a bit blurry"..but the sentiment comes through anyway :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC