|
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 12:10 AM by mistertrickster
equalizer. The idea that Oprah has fewer options in her life because she's a black woman and some trailer-trash white boy is part of the "white male power structure" is absurd.
It's one of the absurdities that emerged during the 60's liberal-chic that went in for "victim identities" instead of traditional economic class interest. When wealthy, educated women told working class males that they were victimized by men, we lost practically every hard-hat in the country. When feminist academics with their cushy airconditioned offices, their six hour a week teaching "load" and their year long sabbaticals, complain that they are discriminated against because the university doesn't offer a "lesbian studies program" while the all-male construction crew outside is swinging sledgehammers in the worst kinds of weather, you have a disconnect from reality that gets reflected in the ballot box.
We split ourselves along gender, racial, and sex orientation lines instead of what really matters, economic class. It led directly to the right-wing backlash: if blacks are liberal, rednecks must be conservative; if gays are liberal, then fundamentalist Christians must be conservative; if feminists are liberal, then traditional stay-at-home moms must be conservative.
By putting "identity politics" above economic interests, we cut ourselves off from the working class and farming communities that were always the democrats' biggest strength.
We blame the conservatives for the politics of division, but look at the radical liberals in the late 60's and 70's. "A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" (Gloria Steinhem) could not have been phrased better for sending white males into the arms of Ronald Reagan and his embrace of everything Joe Six pack loves.
You can't tell half the population that they suck and expect them to back you up at the ballot box. It's time to get back to what really matters--what every political thinker with any real clout clearly identified from Machivelli to Marx: it's the money.
|