Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington Post: Online Nude Photos Are Latest Chapter In Jeff Gannon Saga

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 12:46 AM
Original message
Washington Post: Online Nude Photos Are Latest Chapter In Jeff Gannon Saga
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 12:50 AM by tuvor
ON EDIT: I'm posting this because I believe it's the first MSM outlet to run with the story.

The Jeff Gannon story is still bouncing around the Internet, and now there are pictures.

The kind you shouldn't open up in the office.

The X-rated twist has made for a lot of clandestine clicking in a town where Deep Throat conjures images not of a porn star but of a man in a parking garage. But it has also deepened the debate over blogging and the tactics used to drive a conservative reporter from his job as White House correspondent for two Web sites owned by a Republican activist.

In most Beltway melodramas, the resignation ends the story. The problem for Gannon, whose real name is James Dale Guckert, is that he told The Washington Post and CNN's Wolf Blitzer last week that he never launched the Web sites whose provocative names he had registered, such as hotmilitarystud.com. But a Web designer in California said yesterday that he had designed a gay escort site for Gannon and had posted naked pictures of Gannon at the client's request.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27730-2005Feb15.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. How bout a Gannon Reality TV show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hatalles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
34. Look for Guckert Gannon on the next season of the Surreal Life!
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 03:57 AM by Hatalles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. This asshole is gonna wind up fighting Tanya Harding
in a celebrity boxing match on Pay-Per-View. Watch it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'd pay to see that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. I'd root for Tonya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Do we have to choose?
They both deserve whatever they get. Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. LMAO!
Best one-liner of the day. Thanks, I needed that! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
32. choice of weapons... hubcaps
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Color me confused...
Haven't read all of it yet... but the debate about bloggers figures prominently in the first paragraph rather than the merits regarding access and the WH? :shrug: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. That's been the MSM tactic lately
To talk about how this guy was basically erased from the book of history by the bloggers.

I think the MSM guys are scared absolutely to death.

What is that line The Magistrate uses?

'Kill one, warn one hundred.'

Indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Maybe if they did their jobs it wouldn't be an issue.
The shoddy journalism that goes on is just amazing.

It's like they're making it up or taking it as gospel because some official said it.

If they did their homework and got the whole story, bloggers wouldn't be an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. They may also be hedging their bets.
They disparage bloggers just in case some info. they got from the bloggers isn't right--but if the bloggers are in fact right, they've at least mentioned the matter.

I think they're scared to death too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
23. Do you mean that Ted Koppel could be concerned that his
name will be dragged into all of this again. I read last night where he was a guest at one of the parties thrown during poppy's term. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
24. I agree, they're scared.
They should be. This is a blogger doing real investigating and producing results. Not to mention the fact that the informant came to a blogger and not a MSM source. It makes them look bad and they feel threatened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Read the whole thing, it's broader than that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. "conservative reporter from his job as White House correspondent"
How about FAKE reporter with FAKE name from his FAKE job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Maybe they're saving that for later?
I know it's the Washington Post, but at least SOMEONE with brand-name recognition is finally printing this story. "Page C01," what is that, the third page?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. I believe that would be section C, Page 01
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Sometimes it's the other way around. Can anyone confirm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
25. That would be Page One of section C. --Style?
Watergate broke in section B, the Metro section because it started out as a local news burglery.

I think Section C is the Style section -- the gossip pages, Culteral events, Book section and Comics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. And what's with this Ana Marie Cox? The MSM quotes wonkette.com
Like it's some sort of satirical CULT of personality. Who is this bozo "Ana Marie Cox" who's quoted in this article?

"they are creating a buzz because "obviously pictures of naked people are titillating." But, she added, "bloggers are wrong to bring that into the mix of things of why he shouldn't be a White House correspondent. Aren't we bloggers in favor of a lower bar of access, not a higher one?"

CNN cable news has been taking quotes out of wonkette.com EVERY DAMN DAY THIS WEEK like she will be the new Drudge type solution to dispel the claims of those evil left wing elitist bloggers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
30. Huh?
>>Aren't we bloggers in favor of a lower bar of access, not a higher one?"<<

Um, is this relevant in this case? I mean, for heaven sakes, the man posted sickening obscene pictures of himself to solicit clients who would pay him to perform domination sex.

This "ana marie" is an asshole! It's not like Mr Guckert's "day job" was waiting tables or writing parttime in his home town paper -- rather, the guy was leading a double life. His "day job" was being a WHORE -- and it overlapped by many months with that of "Washington Burea Chief" for Talon News.

Sorry, Ana Marie, maybe YOU want to give the green light to people who prostitute themselves, and feel 100% okay with them having access to the President (as long as he parrots their message <apologies to parrots>) -- but, for as much as "conservatives" love to claim they are Main Street America -- sorry dear, there is nothing "Main Street" about selling rough sex online, and posting obscene pictures of yourself.

Again, their hypocrisy and abject lack of good judgement are totally mind boggling. What "Gannon" did for his day job is totally out of line, utterly creepy and sick. WHY all the self-proclaimed "conservatives" are rushing out to defend him, and people like Blitzer and Kurtz are offering him refuge -- is totally beyond me.

Sex-for-hire "boy" and WH correspondent are incompatible, in my view. I hold truth to be self evident! How "conservatives" or even "liberals" can see these two professions as complementary, as if its the most natural thing in the world to post photos of yourself pissing, or with your legs spread -- I JUST DON'T GET IT!!

Watch for it -- what if Condi and George W were discovered having a long time bonking relationship? (Gee, Condi did have "female troubles" a couple of months ago...) These fascists are so fucking NUTS and utterly hypocritical, that George W could say, on tv live, prime time, "Condi! -- you come here and blow me, girl!!" -- and they would all say it was the most natural and understandable thing in the world, that they were blowing off steam in a time of war, that Condi is beautiful and George W is hot, and Laura understands because she is Soooo Nice! -- and isn't it true that many great leaders have bonked extra-maritally on camera, etc.

Sorry -- anyone who gives "Gannon" a pass is NUTS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. The spin will always be counter to the real meat of the story.
Charlie Rose hosted Wonkette, Andrew Sullivan and Joe Trippi tonight, and the subject was blogging. The only story of any substance they spoke of was "Rathergate." Otherwise, it was a shallow examination of the phenomenon, and very little of the news substance blogs attempt to maintain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
14. Unbelievable.
Maybe the others will follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
15. Finally!!!
It is about time MSM paid attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CindyDale Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
19. Kurtz is being very fair, telling all sides
Surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NAO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
21. Somebody please notify Dr. James Dobson, Falwell, and Robertson
So they can whip their hordes of fanatical supporters into a frenzied witch hunt and burn this pornographer at the stake.

This is ever worse than *gasp* "Sponge Bob Gay Pants".

There is nothing these people enjoy more than condemning a sinner.

Jesus Condems the Social Conservatives AND the Economic Conservatives
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=1581902
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
22. What does Dina Powell, WH Director of Personnel and her
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 01:12 AM by caligirl
husband Michael Powell, sits on the board of GOP/USA and is in the Quinn Gillespie law firm(Ed Gillespie, former RNC until Mehlman got the job) have to do with Guckert?

Do you think there is a connection here being covered up?

Dina Powell meets every week with Bush and Rove concerning the hiring of WH staff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. I don't know what to make of this. It is almost like he is trying to do
some actual reporting but....nah...not Kurtz.. Like they say you must know how to read Pravda. I'm still waiting for the other shoe or shoes to drop. Been waiting awhile for a lot of those damn shoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. KO thinks they will be dropping I hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
27. Now that I have read the artical I have to ask what provoked Kurtz?
He makes excuses for this, stating 'the white house said so' answers to Blitzers questions llast thursday and now this about face. It does state the facts and seems fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Probably couldn't ignore hard facts anymore
Oops, that really was no pun intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v3.0
==================



This week is our first quarter 2005 fund drive. Democratic
Underground is a completely independent website. We depend almost entirely
on donations from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for
your support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
35. Setting all those graphics aside for a moment
Which I know will be a hard thing for all of us sexually repressed Americans to do...

Also setting aside the fact that this "conservative reporter" turned out to be only a conservative playing a reporter in the press corps.

Would someone please tell me how many get out of jail free cards have been given to the Bush* administration for intelligence failures?

From day one this administration has shown an arrogant openess in its refusal to act in the best interest of the American people. Don't believe me? Go look up when the final reports on the USS Cole attack were presented. As I was saying: from DAY ONE this administration has refused to act in the best interest of the American people. From day one this administration has chosen to look the other way as our national security was compromised and mocked. Instead of spending his first months in office organizing a manhunt posse for Osama bin Laden based on those USS Cole reports, Bush* made the decision to spend as much time as humanly possible on vacation. Yes, I realize how many Americans have benefitted from the systematic removal of brush and tumbleweeds in Crawford, Texas, but I tend to believe many more would have benefitted from the capture of bin Laden. Call me crazy.

As new warnings regarding bin Laden's determination to strike on our own soil emerged, the administration continued to do nothing. Eventually all of this culminates in the Sept. 11th attacks. Despite a lot of rough cowboy rhetoric for the benefit of news cameras, very little was done to capture bin Laden. Matter-of-fact, three months later, the nation's Commander in Chief announced he not only didn't know where bin Laden was but that bin Laden was "not a priority." Such a big change from the "wanted dead or alive" statements, isn't it?

For our highest officials to take their eye off an individual who had pinpointed as the mastermind of the worst terrorist attack on American soil there must have been an even larger threat looming, right? There was an attempt made to convey that belief to the citizens. We were told that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (and were trying to acquire more powerful ones), that it was a hot-bed of terrorist activity, that this nation posed a direct and imminent threat to our own. We took our eyes off bin Laden and Afghanistan to pursue Saddam Huissen and Iraq. Once again the Bush* administration acted in a manner counter-productive to the best interests of the American people.

Despite twisting Geneva Conventions and promoting officials based on past failures, we sit in almost the same spot as we were on day one, a little over four years ago. The threat of bin Laden has not been extinguished. Billions upon billions of our tax dollars have been poured into a foreign nation while we contemplate cuts to beneficial programs here at home. (And some believe a naked penis and pleas for anal sex were the only obscene things about this scandal.)

Now we learn that a man -- a criminal -- has been given direct access to our nation's highest officials for the past two years. Why? We simply don't know yet. It could be because this criminal was aware of other criminal activity and used that information to his own advantage. It could also be that our nation's highest officials felt their policies could not stand up to unbiased scrutiny by a true press corps. It could be simply no more than the "Good Ol Boy Network" rearing its ugly head.

Regardless of why, we now have yet another intelligence failure to lay on the pile. A security system which worked overtime to free officials in the Bush* administration of any unsavory individuals during the campaign failed when it had home court advantage. A man using an assumed name -- the same name he had used while commiting illegal acts -- was given a nod and a wave. Once again this administration has failed in its requirement to act in the best interest of the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
36. Conservative reporter?
Since when did this guy qualify as a reporter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Since people stopped caring. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
37. the Hartford (CT) Courant had a humorous article on it today
Dear Mr. McClellan:

I am writing you in regard to the now-vacant position of White House press corps plant.

It is my understanding that your previous press corps plant, James D. Guckert - to whom you issued White House press credentials under the name Jeff Gannon - is no longer with the administration.

I realize, of course, that because of the flap over the administration's policy of having conservative columnists on the payroll, it may not be politically feasible to fill Mr. Guckert's position right away. However, when you do begin hiring again, I hope you will consider me.
...

http://www.courant.com/news/nationworld/hc-caucus0216.artfeb16,0,2153751.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
39. Found a new "action" photo of Jeff/Jim

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC