Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

pick the date!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
blueknight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 08:55 AM
Original message
pick the date!
due to the report of an "unknown" blast that was attributed to aircraft, when will we invade iran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. We already have, according to Seymour Hersh
But when will it be official? I'd say within the next 2 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Where are they going to get the men, though?
That's my question. I'd say invading Iran--an official invasion, is more than a year off.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. you're thinking one dimensionally...
infantry is not the only method in our arsenal.
Note that Rumsfeld was pushing for nuclear bunker busters as recently as one month ago. There has to be a reason.
An invasion does not have to be on the ground.
I"d guess a coordinated attack with US/Isreal forces on their nuclear facilities with bunker busters (which will SEEM justified re: the ramping up of Nuke capabilites). There will be resistance, which will justify full scale shock and awe carpet bombings. After that, Iran will be "softened up" (in a neocon wet-dream, not reality) and it'll be a cakewalk to go in and take over for their own good, they throw flowers at out feet. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I don't know
We nuke Iran with no provocation? Or even pretending that there is a provocation? You might be right, but I would think they would want to clear the rhetorical ground first, like they did with Iraq.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. why should they become MORE reasonable?
As with all despots, as they are unchallenged, their excesses increase.
They were never stopped before, what would stop them now? All fascists govts become more and more maniacal, not the other direction.
I agree any REASONABLE govt. would hesitate. But we aren't talking about a reasonable govt, now are we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktowntennesseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. The personnel are located a couple hundred miles to the west.
I'm convinced that * and Co. assumed Iraq would be a beautiful little democracy by now, and would be such good allies that we could even use their nation as an air base and staging area to launch the next chapter in the war on "terists" in Iran. The idiots in power are still pressing ahead with their grand agenda, albeit at a bit slower pace due to Iraq stubbornly refusing to adhere to the script. But they certainly won't let that little detail stop their plans; in their reality, Iraq isn't that bad, and things will greatly improve any day now, clearing the way for the Iranian exit strategy they've had in mind all along.

In their eyes, its "Axis-of-Evil: one down (almost!), two to go!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I had predicted to someone else within 1 month of Iraq elections...
I could be wrong on that technically, but I bet logistically the elections HAD to happen first, which was why they were so insistent on the deadline. They didn't want to be invading Iran while still trying to coalesce the takeov...er...free elections in Iraq. If the elections had NOT occurred by then, you can bet they never would have after an Iran invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueknight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. i say we will
have israel do a lot of the "dirty work"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. yeah, great minds...while you were typing, I was typing similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. Seems we have two countries in the crosshairs
so the question is which one will be first, Iran or Syria. If we move against both quickly, which will the Israelis be involved in a visible way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. Later this fall, maybe even next spring
They still have to sell this mess, and given the piss poor job of selling the iraq fiasco, people will, or should be a little more attentive than last time.

This something on their agenda, but, it's not easy to invade two countries simultaneously, even if you do have a pit bull at one of the parties bordor.

Laying the groundwork will take time, and we need to organizing a stiff resistance, stiffer than the last one. If we are going to head this maddness off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. again, I ask: what resistance? Why should they care?
have they ever been stopped thus far? I honestly see nothing in their way if they want to do this now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC