Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Press Meeting Yields No Credentialing Changes, Yet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 12:18 PM
Original message
White House Press Meeting Yields No Credentialing Changes, Yet
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000800651

Don't expect major changes to the White House press-credentialing process any time soon.

Following a meeting today between the leadership of the White House Correspondents' Association and President Bush's press secretary, Scott McClellan, neither side seemed to be in a hurry to alter the current system, which has drawn criticism amid the recent "Jeff Gannon" scandal.

After a 30-minute sit-down with McClellan, WHCA President Ron Hutcheson said he believed the current system was fine and hesitated to have the correspondents' association play a bigger role in distributing press passes. "I'm not sure we need to do anything," Hutcheson told E&P. "I'm not comfortable in passing judgment on who is a journalist and who isn't. My overriding view is that if I am going to make a mistake, it is going to be on letting people in rather than keeping people out."

But Hutcheson said the full nine-person WHCA board will consider the matter on Feb. 28, and, if the board members want to seek changes to the process or vote to play a greater role in it, he will not stop them. "The board may feel differently than me," he added. "We will go back and tell them what are the criteria."




Sure...the current system is just fine and dandy! I'd like to see me go there and get a day pass that easily (considering I have zero journalistic experience). I'd level some questions Bush's way for sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. They don't let anyone who calls himself a journalist ask questions.
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 12:22 PM by Eric J in MN
Even among the people who get in, there are reporters who have never gotten to ask a question in years of attendance at White House press conferences.

James Guckert ("Jeff Gannon") repeatedly got to ask questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Things I'd like to see:
1) McClellan suddenly resigns.
2) Stories of McClellan having "intimate" knowledge of Guckert surface.
3) Guckert is questioned again by Fitzgerald.
4) Indictments are handed out to Guckert and to Sr. White House members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's Flood The Press Room
I guess anyone with a political website qualifies as "journalist" (no offense to the real journalists out there...the rare and brave few who can only use the internet to get the truth out) should be able to get credentials and sit in on Scotty's daily gaggles and briefings.

I wonder how much Whitewash Hutcheson had to purchase...and how he's able to keep all that shit in without it blowing out his ears. This lacky was interviewed last week...I think it was CNNservative...before the "Gannon" websites came out and "Talon News" was completely exposed and said "There's nothing here to see...".

I can't believe this guy claims to be a "journalist"...there's a story right under his nose and not only ignores it, he wants it to go away. Shame must be brought on these people, if nothing else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, the righties are now ragging on Russell Mokhiber
Saying he's posing as a journalist.


Only difference is, this guy has actually written something instead of cutting-n-pasting from GOP releases. Oh, and he was planted by the White House (Mokhiber was denied daily passes for four months and never got a hard pass.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Let's Go One Step More...
Let's compare Mokhiber and his website/publication and how it's funded and operated compared to that of "Gannon's" and "Talon News". My bets are Mokhiber had to submit to a security check of every cavity and a trace on his lineage going back as far as DNA can go. "Gannon" didn't get such a going over.

Then...let's look at who the patrons of what Mr. Mokhiber does and "Gannon"...who pays the bills to put him in that press room and who consumes what he writes.

This part scares the shit out of corporate media. Accountability...always good for someone other than them...the mantra of the new millenium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Even more, Mokhiber has been plying his trade for many years...
...way before B*sh II hit the White House, in fact. And he does more than write the "Scotty and Me" column. He writes a legal weekly paper called "The Corporate Crime Reporter" and he's a published book author. Imagine dragging him into this Gannon fiasco. There's desperation, for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 16th 2024, 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC