|
Edited on Thu Feb-17-05 02:38 PM by lawladyprof
In the White House? If the presence of Monica defiled the "People's House," how much more so the presence of a person to takes money for having sex with strangers, who posts pornographic photographs of his genitals on the Internet for thousands of people to look at? I consider myself to be a fairly liberal person, but I don't associate with prostitutes and I assume that the people I see on television, reporters and the like, also do not "rub shoulders" with such people unless necessary, say for a work assignment or if they were doing charity work--where, presumably they would know that the person was a prostitute. How insulting to the White House press corps that the administration itself arranged for them to have to interact and associate with such a person. If the administration knew Jeff Gannon was a male prostitute, then they deceived the press corps and furthermore, could reasonably assume that Mr. Gannon might attempt to engage in sordid activities involving members of the White House press corps, perhaps entraping journalists into compromising situations that could lead to blackmail. If the administration didn't know, then they were just plain incompetent and still put the integrity of reporters in the press corps at risk.
Turning from the more salacious aspects of this debacle, aren't the reporters in the press corps insulted (and where, I might ask, is the indignation) that the administration itself debased and degraded their professional standards by allowing a Republican operative to be seen as their equal/the equivalent of reputable journalist?
|