...about the war in Iraq being exactly what the terrorists were looking for to recruit more terrorists.
Now, suppose for a moment that instead of a war being waged against terrorism, Bush had made the purpose of invading the Middle Eastern countries, a war against all Arabs as a national group (i.e. All Arab countries = Arab nation).
Would it not follow that the Arab nation in an effort to defend itself could recruit Arabs to defend their national identity against an invading force?
I think yes, in the same way that Bush assembled a coalition of nations to provide military support for America's invasion of Iraq. Bush has marched our country to the very cusp of total war in the region. Syria and Jordon on the west, Iran and Pakistan on the east, Saudi Arabia to the south. Even Turkey could join in with their Muslim brothers and Egypt might just consider settling old scores with Israel.
The question to DUers and especially those of you who understand military strategy, how much of a fix would our U.S. forces be in should the major Arab nations with strong military capabilities unite on all of those fronts? If they took such action immediately, could the U.S. now send sufficient troops into the region to defend against such attacks? Who would join with the U.S.? Who would come in on the side of the Arabs?
Scary scenario, eh!
<no sure, but I think this is the link to that article>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?node=admin/email&referrer=emailarticle