Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hilarious defense of Gannon by Conservative Voice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bhaisahab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 10:47 PM
Original message
Hilarious defense of Gannon by Conservative Voice
Edited on Thu Feb-17-05 10:48 PM by paagal kutta
Liberals have Their Jeff Gannon

WASHINGTON -- Accuracy in Media charged today that a liberal activist and associate of Ralph Nader has been obtaining access to White House press briefings while claiming to be a legitimate news reporter.

Russell Mokhiber, who sells a $795 a year newsletter that bashes corporations, attends the briefings to make obscure anti-Bush political points. Recently, for example, he asked spokesman Scott McClellan whether President Bush violated one of the Ten Commandments by invading Iraq. Mokhiber, who told AIM that he has never taken a journalism class in his life and was denied a permanent White House press pass, posts his ludicrous questions and answers on a far-left web site under the title "Scottie & Me."

Other Mokhiber topics have included industrial hemp, Israel's 1967 attack on the USS Liberty, possible war crimes charges against Bush, and Halliburton.

AIM editor Cliff Kincaid said Mokhiber's attendance at the briefings makes it clear that the controversy over Jeff Gannon attending the same briefings was manufactured by left-wing bloggers and liberals in the media because they don't want conservatives in the White House press corps.

http://www.theconservativevoice.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=2982



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. The liberal reporter met the standards, while "Jeff Gannon"
got preferential treatment to get in.

"Jeff Gannon" also got to ask questions much more often, in spite of less experience.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Gannon was a "call boy" for the GOP
Let's see them trump that.

Morans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nope. We just don't want man-whore paid propagandists ...
in the White House press pool.

Just imagine if this was a Democratic administration.

AIM would be in convulsions if it were a Democratic man-whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. I don't even care if he's a man-whore.
He was a paid propagandist. That's what bugs the hell out of me. The professional sexuality is just color and context, illustrating the amazing hypocrisy of the "moral values" crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Mokhiber's M4M military-themed escort site is really HOT!
Didn't they mention that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Has Russ outed any CIA agents?
didn't think so...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. This guy has been writing news since at least 1988
Edited on Thu Feb-17-05 11:44 PM by brainshrub
Thankfully this guy has an easy name to track. If this Russell Mokhiber is the same guy, he's been writing since 1988:

http://multinationalmonitor.org/hyper/issues/1988/04/mm0488_10.html

He has also been on Democracy Now:

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/02/17/160218

He's an investigative journalist with at least two books written:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-form/102-6166623-0964931

He doesn't simply take press-releases and re-write them like some other people do. He's light-years more qualified to be in the Presidential Press room than Gannon ever was.

ON EDIT: I have only touched on some of his credentials. The RW has picked the wrong person to use as an example of an "under-qualified" journalist.

ON EDIT II: I have tried to post my quick research on Mokhiber on The Conservative Voice, but for the ability to reply to the article is either malfunctionong or turned of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verdalaven Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I probably shouldn't be, but I am.....
I am amazed by their lack of objectivity.

I liked Clinton as a president and I voted for him twice, but I didn't agree with everything he said and did like some robot turned out by the DNC. What is wrong with these people that they cannot step back and objectively view the situation without becoming so defensive that they cannot see the forest for the trees? It's like their very lives depend on b*sh being perfect and anything less is entirely unacceptable.

Sorry to rant, but GOD I cannot believe that they are defending Gannon/Guckert being in the WH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. they are attempting to circle the wagons you know, close ranks
they will try it for awhile unless things get worse and then they will either ignore it all together or turn on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. can somebody post the porno pics of Mokhiber?
then we'll talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't want conservatives or liberals in the WH press corp
I want friggin reporters that are going to hold both sides feet to the fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Amen to that.
It's okay to be a Liberal or Conservative, but you've got a responsibility to: 1) As best you can, report the facts and back it up with research. 2) Let readers be able to easily find out where your ideology lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. like any other job
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 01:15 AM by shadowknows69
leave your personal shit at home. do your job. especially when the future of our democracy depends on it. and personally I don't think your ideology should be apparent at all. asking tough questions of a government official is not a partisan thing. In any given situation there are obivious questions that should be asked period. no personal politics involved just what common sense tells us should be asked. Who, What, Where, When, Why and How? The basics are still the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. Is Russell Mokhiber a hooker who advertises his services
on the internet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kinkistyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
15. ITS THE PROPAGANDA, STUPID!
These people just don't get it. If it were Clinton up there with conservative reporters asking tough questions, it would be totally O.K. because its the reporter's job to ask tough questions.

DUH!

But if Clinton had a left-wing uncredentialed plant in the press corp. feeding spouting WH propaganda and asking incredibly biased "non-questions". Yes that would be wrong.

Why can't these morans see the difference? Are they deficient?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. They are muddying the waters, it's their MO.
They are reducing the outrage and charges of malfeasance over Gannon to an OPINION.

Well, hey, on the right wing they have their opinions too - specifically about journalists who happen to be critical of Buchco.

Once we are in the realm of opinions, anything goes and no one is right (or wrong).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. What the article didn't mention:
HE'S A FUCKIN' PROSTITUTE!

oy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC