Should the Washinton Blade publish the other Gannon porno pic?

[jdj]

http://www.washblade.com/2005/2-18/news/national/reporter.cfm

This the caption below a photo of a seated Gannon:

".... In the other photo, which the Blade is not publishing, the man who appears to be Guckert is embracing another man while exposing his penis."

Since the Aravosis report, two sources have confirmed to the Washington Blade that Guckert attended a December 1998 Christmas party near Leesburg, Va., that “always turns into an orgy toward the end.”

I personally would like a pixelated version of this plastered all over the internet, to show this man was not just a pin-up, but was the real deal. I'm really sad for him. However, it needs to be driven home that it IS NOT POSSBLE for the white house to know of the fact that he had an ALIAS, and a TAX EVASION CONVICTION, yet not know that he was gay. No way, no how. They allowed the alias because they knew the bloggers would expose Guckert's tax suit once they heard his softball questions. They were close to this man. He is an insider. I just want the world to know he is a gay, or bisexual, insider as well, so that it can be driven home that homosexuality and liberalism are not synonyms and can be quite exclusive of each other. This is important to the democratic party, since repukes like to pretend they don't have any gays.\

Well the picture is out there somewhere. Maybe it will surface.

[jdj]

1. this needs to be a poster captioned "The new face of the republican party"