Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are Democrats Tougher on Bush or Dean?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 05:29 PM
Original message
Are Democrats Tougher on Bush or Dean?
If they fought as hard against Bush over the last three years as they are against Dean, we'd have the House AND Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dean made his name by attacking the other Dem candidates and
the Dem party. You reap what you sow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haymaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's a steaming pile and you know it.
He made his name by coming out against the war, by pointing out the Bush junta's bullshit, and by having an unprecedented online machine.

A few shots across the bow to the Bush apologist crowd maybe just woke you up. Good morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. January 23, Dean attacks the others as "Bushlite"
and YOU know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. And YOU didn't READ what I said. SCROLL down and take a look
Edited on Wed Sep-10-03 05:54 PM by Sean Reynolds
So take the blindfold off and re-read what I said. Dean apologized for using the term Bushlite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
30. When did he apologize for "Bushlite"
I would imagine that it would have been posted here at DU if he had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Bush-lite. That sounds about right.
That was back when the Democrats in Congress were pretty much hoping that Dean would go away and were saying that all who oppose the Iraq war (which Dean did) were "soft on defense".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. Dean supported a slightly different resolution.
He was labeled antiwar and ran with the support it brought him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. The FIRST person I heard Republican-Lite from (outside Nader) was Kerry
he's chastises Republican-lite then he gives us examples of why he is same

I dont see why you should blame Dean for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. talk about a steaming pile
Dean was the first to attack the other candidates as "Bush lite" and "DLC" - while Dean himself is a Rockefeller Republican and a former member of the DLC who spent his governorship as an "ambassador" for NAFTA - the ultimate DLC creation.

Any objective observer can read DU and see Dean supporters bashing the other candidates in one thread, and whining about Dean bashing in the other.

At least I admit that I bash the candidates I don't like (Dean, Kerry, Graham, and Lieberman).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. While I admit *I'm* a candidate basher,
Edited on Wed Sep-10-03 06:16 PM by poskonig
Dean himself has been pretty cool about not giving Rove soundbites for the other guys. When Dean does slip up, an apology is usually given.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Oh I'll freely admit Lieberman is much worse than Dean at that
when it comes to providing GOP soundbites. I watched both of the debates, and Lieberman was a shameless Republican - I was shocked. None of the other candidates have done that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He hardly attacked Dems
And when he did he apologized for it and has been pretty cool since. Most of his attacks are on Dem policy, not the Dem candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. And...
besides that, I feel that any Democrat who is a centrist and in some cases fairly conservative, who then stands on his "liberal" platform to win an election (any election) deserves to be questioned.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phishhead Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Do what?
I have no idea where you get this, but I've seen and read many interviews, debates, etc, where he'll specifically say he's a centrist.

Can you point to any reference or situation where Dean has touted himself as being some hardcore liberal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Attack dean on his position and what he says
don't make up straw men to attack, please. Dean is *not* a liberal and has never once said he is a liberal. The media tries to portray him as a liberal. If you've got a beef with that description take it up with big media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. I agree.
He did attack some of them. And they very well deserved it. Bending over for Bush and saying "giddy-up!" reaps its own consequences also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. Failing to negotiate for a better deal
with an intransigent White House would be dereliction of duty.

YOU wanted Bush's REAL blank check, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dean is a Winner ...and it doesn't matter who in the Dem party
attack him..he is a Winner in Life and I hope he can be our President!

But you have a point...if the dems(dlc types) attacked bush like they did Dean we would, no doubt, have made some News!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Or; Bush or any other candidate?
Kucinich is a flake. Kerry and Gephardt are warmongers. Lieberman is a DINO. Carol has a scandal in her past. Sharpton and Tawana Brawley. Dean is not being picked on any more than any other candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. you forgot Edwards and Graham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. allow me:
Edwards is a lightweight pretty-boy warsucking toady to the fascists with no loyalty to keep the senate seat that he betrays us all by misusing so. Graham's an old fuddy-duddy. Just thought I'd cover all the bases here...

EVERYONE takes hits. Some are fair, some are unfair. Many Deanies just don't want to accept that their guy has personally attacked the others on a regular basis.

As you probably know, I'm an Edwards supporter and feel he's potentially a true statesman for the ages. I personally like the others except Lieberman and increasingly Dean, and any would be worlds better than Junior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Many "Deanies"
understand the primary process(not all). The leader is always attacked. When Kerry and Lieberman were considered the front-ruinners, Dean attacked. Now that he (arguably) is the front-runner, he is being attacked. No surprise at all. The strongest and smartest will prevail.

Darwin in motion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HazMat Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
17. Democrats should fight both men with an equal sense of urgency
Since a Dean nomination=Bush re-election.

This is an important moment in our country's history, and we can't send an unelectable candidate like Dean to face Bush. It would be a disaster for the Democratic Party and America. Dean supporters are irresponsible and selfish and don't care anything about the future of this country, only about "sticking it" to the Democratic establishment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Dean is much better than Kerry.
Kerry would get *owned* for not supporting Gulf War I. Besides, given that Bush is weak on the Iraq debacle, how can we attack Bush with candidates who support him, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. I have to admit
they attack Bush much more then they attack Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. finally some straight talk
Edited on Wed Sep-10-03 07:01 PM by Uzybone
thanks for saying what should be plain to everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. Democrats are jealous of Dean
Seems beating Bush is secondary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. Right now, Dean is taking the heat, 'cause he's on top of the pile...
I wish they'd stop that sh** and stick to the business at hand, which is to blow * out of the water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. Total rubbish
the democrats attacking Dean. Get your messiah complex out of your system. Please Deanies stop this crap and lets work TOGETHER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. There's no "messiah complex"...facts are facts.
The dlc was attacking Dean so much that Terry McAuliff had to issue a directive to cease and desist!

We're not paranoid and it's Not "total rubbish".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
28. Dems Oughten Attack Dems, Listening-DEANites? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. I'm afraid I can't listen to anyone using the word
"oughten" :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
32. "unacceptable for the U.S. to be `evenhanded'"
.."It is unacceptable for the U.S. to be `evenhanded' on these fundamental issues," the letter said....."

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2003/09/10/national2031EDT0898.DTL

There is no excuse for this statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC