http://powerlineblog.com/archives/2003_03.php#002534<snip>The preceding controversy prompted by Lindner derived from his refusal to pay tribute to homosexuals as victims of the Holocaust. Reading the comments relating to that remark -- comments coming from each of the state's seven Jewish state representatives -- one would think that Minnesota is a state with a significant Jewish population. In fact, Jews constitute approximately one percent of the state's population of five million. It is also difficult to follow the train of thought of the Jewish DFL representatives who purported to take offense at Lindner's failure to include homosexuals among the victims of the Holocaust.
One of the morals of this story is the advantage of knowing a little history. Lindner could have had a lot of fun in the contretemps if he had been only been even slightly knowledgeable of the sexual orientation of the prominent "175ers" among the Nazi leadership. Lothar Machtan's The Hidden Hitler makes the case that Hitler himself was probably homosexual and that the Nazi anti-homosexual legislation was implemented to protect Hitler from slander and blackmail.
In any event, the Strib story has incredible entertainment value: "Lawmaker condemned by Holocaust survivor now accused of racism." The Strib also includes a summary of Lindner's previously "controversial" remarks; they provide invaluable insight into the hokum involved here: "A history of controversy." (Courtesy of Dr. David Pence.)
<snip>
http://powerlineblog.com/archives/002546.php<snip>For amusement purposes only, let us return to the point I suggested regarding Hitler's homosexual cadres. Anyone familiar with the history of the Nazi party knows that male homosexuals were prominent among both the perpetrators and the victims of Nazism. As head of the SA until his murder by other of Hitler's goons on the Night of the Long Knives, Ernst Roehm was one of the essential instruments of Hitler's rise to power. He was also a flagrant homosexual whose sexual depravity knew no bounds. His service to Hitler was so important that when he came under intraparty attack for his homosexuality, Hitler defended Roehm (and his homosexual cadres) in words that make Hitler sound like a good DFL liberal in the mold of Allan Spear or Phyllis Kahn.
As early as February 1931, Hitler issued a remarkable decree concerning "the attacks on the private lives" of "very senior and senior SA officers." These, as Hitler saw them, were based mainly on circumstances "wholly extraneous to the context of duties to the SA." He "vigorously and on principle" rejected all requests to "rule" on these. Hitler protested that the SA men's "private life cannot be an object of scrutiny unless it runs counter to vital principles of National Socialist ideology."
Do you suppose that any of the politicians weighing in on the historicity of Rep. Lindner's comments on homosexuals and the Holocaust will introduce this element of complexity into the discussion?<snip>
How DARE those libruls talk about Gannon's sexual orientation?!?!?!