http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1347915/posts?page=32#32Sorry, I know some of you don't like it when some of their posts are copies here but these take the cake!
-----------------------
I am sure this nonstory is going nowhere. But I do hope that Gannon is okay and will soon get his life back together. He seem to be a survivor.
31 posted on 02/21/2005 10:17:31 AM PST by JJDPower
To: JJDPower
I am sure this nonstory is going nowhere. But I do hope that Gannon is okay and will soon get his life back together. He seem to be a survivor.
He should laugh out loudly in the faces of his critics and write a story about their hypocrisy. He should laugh even louder while listing reporters/writers/politicians (Hartpence, you hear me?!) who have used another name.
He should give his byline as "Anonymous, uh, Joe Klein, uh, I mean, Jeff Gannon, a man who laughs in his adversaries' hypocritical faces."
Then, he should laugh again...loudly, often, and in their faces every chance he gets. He should ask every "soft-ball" question he can pose that inherently exposes the leftist media for what it is....self-appointed leftist do-gooders who really think they are a Constitutional branch of the US government when most are hacks for what used to be the Democratic Party.
IMHO and thank you.
32 posted on 02/21/2005 10:30:35 AM PST by hummingbird ("If it wasn't for the insomnia, I could have gotten some sleep!")
To: Pikamax
Notice that this article is long, dull, and boring. That's because they wanted to keep the propaganda war against Gannon alive, but couldn't find anything to say.
So they keep it alive (barely). But few people will be able to get through this article, it's so dull. And nobody will be inflamed by it or understand what the fuss is all about.
I call him Gannon, because that's the professional name he has chosen to use. When talking about his conduct as a reporter, the New York Times should also have had the basic decency and professional courtesy to use his preferred name, as they would in reporting about anyone else whom they didn't hate with kneejerk leftist reflexes.
33 posted on 02/21/2005 10:53:19 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
To: L.N. Smithee
The rising presence of the right in news via the blogosphere is the seed.
They are indeed hysterically panic stricken.
They really have no confidence in themselves. And, their ideology must override anything else as well to create this sort of obsessive response to the idea that maybe a reporter was not against Bush and asked a question that actually made fun of democrats.
34 posted on 02/21/2005 11:00:09 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)