Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just heard on radio Scott Peterson's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
plcdude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 01:22 PM
Original message
Just heard on radio Scott Peterson's
attorneys are seeking a new trial based on a prison confession from another individual that was kept from the court and defense counsel. Anyone heard about this yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
plcdude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. did you hear
what I heard? just checking. Maybe but there are alot of unanswered questions with this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm not a bit surprised.
He was convicted of being a bad husband, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. SFGate article on new trial request
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/baycitynews/archive/2005/02/25/peterson25.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plcdude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. thanks
way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow! If true, it is a blatant violation of two major SC cases...
Brady v Maryland and US v Bagley. Either one would invalidate the trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC