My E-mail to James "Bulldog" Guckert

[UdoKier]

RE: Hey "Bulldog"


Mr Guckert,

Where do you get off claiming to be a victim of a witch hunt when you were so clearly a propaganda tool of this phony administration? How do you construe what you were doing as "journalism" when all you did was
repeat Bush & Rush's talking points in your "questions", when all the garbage you posted at hangnail news was nothing more than cut-and-paste from White House Press Releases and Fox News propaganda? That's not
journalism, that's STENOGRAPHY.

You have the nerve to claim that you were attacked because you dared cross "the ideological barrier that keeps conservatives out of the press room". You know damn well that that press room is full of conservatives and
moderate writers who are scared to death of losing WH access, so they seldom write anything critical. Helen Thomas and Russell Mokhiber are the exception, NOT the rule. I recall the right-wing stooge "Brit Hume"
was a fixture in that press room for many years before your fascist pals completely took over the media.

You seem to be very vague in alluding to and partially owning up to your 'past'. So why don't you be forthright and clear and address these questions?

1. Have you ever offered your services as a male prostitute? If so, for how long?

2. Are those lurid pictures you? How do you square that with your nonsensical "family values" rhetoric?

3. Are you gay? If so, how do you square that with your many gay-bashing articles?

4. Is it true that your only credential as a journalist is from a $50 right-wing seminar on how to infiltrate the media?

I don't expect a sincere, honest answer from you, since everything you've ever said or written has been self-deluded and phony.


Last, you attack David Brock for turning on his millionaire benefactor, Richard Mellon Scaife. He could have just as easily continued making good money from the likes of Scaife by printing lies about Hillary Clinton and
Anita Hill, but he did the honorable thing and told the truth.

Since everything he ever wrote about the Clintons was a Scaife-financed lie, doesn't that make you wonder how many of the other "facts" you accept as truth are actually lies?

You would do well to follow his example and tell the truth, but you won't because, unlike Brock, you're no writer. And if you were to "turn", you would receive momentary accolades from the left from telling the truth, but
you could never parlay it into a long-term career, because unlike the right, where no-talent cronies are always in demand, the left would NOT accept cut-and-paste nonsense from a hack as "journalism".

So I guess you've made the only choice you could make. Marine Fetish Hooker is out, because time is catching up with you and Washington closet cases don't want to hire some sagging old shaved-headed geek who
spouts dittohead nonsense all the time.

Turning to the left won't work, because we actually expect a modicum of integrity and writing ability in our journalists - so you'll try to resurrect your career as a whore for Karl and Karen.

And if that doesn't work, you can go back to teaching phys. ed classes for little kids (that's a scary thought).

Yours, "Udokier" (I know how you like pseudonyms)

[bahrbearian]

1. Well I least I got to read it

I doubt Bulldog reads it.
Upon Edit ,a very well put letter.

[mzmolly]

2. Well said!

:toast:

[Mayberry Machiavelli]

3. Did dude teach phys ed to kids? How would we know this?

[UdoKier]

4. It was in his old "Talon News" bio, before they erased him.

This self-hating military fetishist teaching kids...


:scared:

[tuvor]

5. Good one. If he replies, I'd love to see it.

Thanks for your efforts.