Star-Tribune, Minneapolis 2/25/05
When Congress passed a landmark overhaul of welfare in 1996, Washington made a deal with parents on public assistance: You leave welfare and get a job. We'll help pay for child care, health insurance and skills training so you can provide for your family and join the nation's economic mainstream.
Welfare recipients did their part. Since 1996 the number of families on cash aid has dropped by more than half, from 4.6 million to fewer than 2 million. Some 2 million parents have left the caseloads and taken jobs. And for a time, Washington played its role too, with big increases in child-care subsidies and tax credits for the working poor.
But now President Bush is reneging on the government's end of the bargain. Under the budget Bush presented to Congress this month, about 300,000 low-income families would lose child care subsidies in the next five years. Some 370,000 families would lose federal rental vouchers, according to estimates by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities in Washington, D.C. The president also proposes, in effect, a 30 percent cut in the federal block grants that help states like Minnesota pay for job training, home-heating assistance and other social services for the working poor.
Many Americans comfort themselves with the notion that work alone can liberate a poor, single mother from any need for public help. But nine years of welfare reform, including a series of studies by respected scholars, have proven that to be mostly wrong. The typical welfare "leaver" gets a part-time job paying $8 an hour, which isn't enough to pay for child care, health insurance or even a decent apartment in a safe part of town. As New York Times reporter Jason DeParle documented in his powerful book, "American Dream," many mothers leaving welfare toil long hours in strenuous jobs, while gaining no ground financially and leaving their children unsupervised for long hours in dangerous neighborhoods.....
more
http://www.startribune.com/stories/561/5259363.html