The reason I went on the Internet and logged onto the virtual America was the Abu Ghraib pictures.
I'm sorry to say that, because there was a certain event some years before that which should have been the reason - if one gets right down to it.
In the beginning I just wanted to hurt you all, yell at you. There was no liberals or conservatives, just Americans, manifested in the horrible pictures of young boys and girls doing ... what they did.
And of course topping it all: the incredible human turn-off called George W. Bush.
You can read my first post here, mercilessly cut in half by the forum software, increasing my feeling of rejection and unwelcome-ness:
http://www.motherjones.com/cgi-bin/WebX?128@38.A6reaQwwaVu.3@.ee9cb2a
My picture of America at the time was a superficial one--of a country far away gone berserk on nationalism and hippocrisy, and I honestly tell you: the quality and openmindedness of boards like DU changed that picture, took away the lingering impression left by the torture and reinstated the image of Americans as a great people.
Why? Because I discovered the respect for the common law among you, and that moral still was present. And I'm talking about real moral, the one that has nothing to do with nudity and everything to do with how you treat other people.
The Abu Ghraib pictures showed a lack of moral, a breakup of common law and disrespect for every institutionalized humanitarian value slowly and painfully negotiated since WWII.
But it wasn't the troops fault, and thanks to places like this I was able to find that out.
I understand that it is difficult to watch people on a board throw snide comments that appears to be unfair, especially as the war is closer to some than others. We are all pampered by half a century of peace at home--this doesn't apply to Americans only, but also here in Europe.
We live in peace. We utter expressions about war lacking the experience of what war really is, and the sacrifices that are made every day in terms of fear for loved ones, the toll of injuries and finally; the loss of lives.
This is what we have become, and not knowing what war is shows that we have succeeded to some extent to achieve the goal of the previous generations. They fought the nazi's to ensure peace and stability instituted by common law and respect. And to make war experience a thing of the past.
Sadly, this also makes it easier for those without respect to start new wars. The freeloaders, easygoers and bandits that prey on every society, looking for an easy buck without noticing the smell of death.
This is NOT the quality of the people at DU.
If you want to defend the troops, you should ally yourself with the ones asking questions wether a war is just or not.
Like John Kerry, because the strongest proof of his character quality was ever his willingness to fight for his country AND his willingness to ask questions about it afterwards.
Just as the many vets here at DU, he has the experience of what war really means and the guts and persistence to do something about it.
As opposed to the neocons, with their quick slogans like 'If one soldier dies, that's one too many' and the 'Support the troops'- bumper stickers. Cheap and superficial, intended to sell the war as a glorified moment in history even before it has ended.
Politics...
And politics it is, because the way they have politicized the US Army and turned it into a partisan factor to further their means is ABHORRANT! The break-up of moral and subsequent atrocities is a result of policy from above, not happenstance and coincidence, and with every day that passes tha policy drags the name and reputation of the American military further down into the mud.
It is in that direction you should vent your anger, not at the people at DU--with or without war experience--that's so upset about this that they don't know which foot to stand on.
Understand me right, I think your post was good, and it's certainly just to remind us all that people are dying, and deserves respect for their service.
But don't go away, will ya? :-)