|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-26-05 03:34 PM Original message |
"Camp Victory North" Near Baghdad To Be The LARGEST US Base EVER! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SouthernDem2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-26-05 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. Interesting article but your header is completely false. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-26-05 03:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Not" Completely false"... sheesh... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SouthernDem2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-26-05 04:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Well you did get the part about Camp Victory being in Iraq correct but the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-26-05 04:03 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. apparently you have not read the article... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SouthernDem2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-26-05 04:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. I read the article. Where does it say "Largest Base Ever?" Where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-26-05 04:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. It also insures that the "Iraqi Army" will never be equipped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop_the_War (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-26-05 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
2. This confirms that the neo-cons are going to re-instate the draft. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SouthernDem2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-26-05 03:55 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. In what way? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-26-05 04:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. yepper! and I say.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-26-05 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. What a good target for a Pakistani nuke on a cheap UAV! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-26-05 04:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Good point. These bases will be nothing but big ass targets ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-26-05 04:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. And nukes excel at taking out big targets. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-26-05 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
6. No, to "Exit" is not part of the strategy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC