Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Best Post of the Day

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 04:41 PM
Original message
Best Post of the Day
I don't know if this is allowed but this post, imo, by HamstersfromHell is the best response to that poster that was leaving. I just wanted others here to read it in case they missed it before. Mods, please have mercy.:-)

_____________________________________________________________

HamstersFromHell (430 posts) Sat Feb-26-05 03:20 AM
Response to Original message

#133. I find this whole thing to be rather disingenuous.


To come in with flag waving awards and "see what I did" mom and pop and apple pie "patriotism" while espousing to support the troops, then saying "I can't take it, so I'm leaving" kinda reeks. Especially knowing it'd turn into a full blown flame war. Then you stick around to argue with those who don't see it your way.

To me supporting our troops means getting them home from an illegal occupation of a soverign nation NOW.

As someone else pointed out, we (as a country) haven't engaged in a legitimate "war" of self-defense since Pearl Harbor, and if you cared to really examine that, the Japanses were forced to the point of attacking by U.S. foreign policy toward them. All the rest, call them "wars" or "police actions" have been mostly proactive aggressions against other nations.

Those who were drafted never had a real "choice"...fight for the policy of our "leadership", be imprisoned or leave the country.

The rest of our fathers, mothers, sons and daughters volunteered for that job. Either out of a sense of some moral values they held regarding the particular conflict our nation was involved in, or else out of the mere fact that they needed a paycheck too. (Does anyone else remember the MAD magazine take off of a recruiting poster from the '70's "De Poor, De Colored, De Marines"?) I would imagine there are other reasons as well, known and not known to me and/or others in this forum.

It still stands that all those who volunteered did so knowing full well they might be asked to put themselves in harm's way, perhaps some of them praying to themselves all along that they might be able to serve long enough to be able to have the government pay their way through college without ever being called to see a battlefield, much less actually kill another human being. Nonetheless, they are now being called on to kill or be killed in yet another foreign policy blunder of yet another misguided administration.

Most of those National Guardsmen probably figured they were never going to have to see anything worse then helping police some street in our own country when some unforseen natural disaster hit.

Still, they volunteered. "You knew the job was dangerous when you took it."

Believe me, I support the troops. But like so many here, I see this administration's "photo opping" and "sound biting" of this illegal war. Calling a spade a spade (in the opinions we're allegedly allowed to have here) doesn't automatically equal not supporting the troops, just because you happen to see it that way. You have your opinions, other may see it your way, some may differ. If you don't like what you see, use Alert (in case of rules breaking) or Ignore.

But spare me that no matter what you've done to help our troops, that we all owe them any more debt of gratitude than to our own law enforcement officers or our firefighters, who face those very same dangers every day right here in our own country. They volunteered too.

They have one thing our troops don't have. They can decide enough is enough and quit. It seems you've availed yourself of that option as well.

So if you have decided enough is enough, go ahead and quit. But don't tell anyone else how they should support anything. You've lost that high ground, since those dads, moms, sons and daughters you claim to support can't say to themselves the very same thing: "I can't take this anymore, I'm going to quit." If you want to quit, fine, do so, but don't "quit" by claiming you're the sole proprietor of the moral high ground and tossing verbal incindiary grenades down the hill just to see who'll bite.

Stay or leave, you make that call. I'll engage any intelligent discussion. Either way, I wish you well.

_____________________________________________________________

Hey, did I just do a Jeff Gannon?:-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. You did Jeff Gannon????
It's a great post, you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. It was just as good this time as it was when I read it at 3:20AM.
Deserved the repost. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Your welcome!
The next time I see hamstersfromhell post, I will thank her (or him).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is anyone else here conflicted by a point
that you reminded me about in your post...namely, I can't decide whether I am totally anti war or just anti war in this case (Iraq, or anything to do with bush* or neocon agenda). I remember the Viet Nam War, and altho I was pretty young, I knew something was "wrong" about it, and didn't support it at all. Whether or not I am totally against war in every circumstance, I just don't know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I don't think I'm totally anti-war.
I gather some wars are needed, i.e. our Civil war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. anti-war versus anti-SOME-wars
i was very against the Vietnam War and the "invasion and occupation" of Iraq ... i have never seen myself as a pacifist, however ... if a government seeks to go to war for legitimate purposes, I think that's, well, legitimate ...

HOWEVER, it's important to understand that the U.S. government and it's blind service to massive, multi-national corporations will never declare war for legitimate reasons ... the government itself is corrupt ... wars are fought today only to gain more power, territory and resources for American-based corporations ... so, until democracy re-emerges and America returns to being among the good guys in the world, i'm opposed to any and all wars declared (or otherwise) by this corrupt government ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. I agree... was one of the first posts I read this morning...
while I was coming to terms with understanding the duplicity of the swan-song of the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chlamor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Excellent post
I've grown weary of the "Support the Troops" talk from all angles. What about support the Iraqi children and a people's right to autonomy. That is heresy in most circles. "Support the Troops" really doesn't mean anything, it seems like a jingoistic platitude meant to pressure anthem-like conformity.

All military- All the time.

I support peoples right to have economic rights that would enable people to live lives of meaning without the hierarchical/authoritarian arrangements. Let's focus on that instead of ribbons-flags-banners etc. I'm afraid we are living in a complete military state. I see it every day. Such a violent society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. what the hell does "support the troops" mean anyway ??
i've been reading many of the posts on this subject that have been flying all over DU ...

here's my two cents ... yeah, i "support the troops" ... i support them if the phrase means that i wish them well ... i hope for their safety and i hope they have whatever they need to protect themselves ... and i know they and their families have suffered greatly ...

now, having said that, the policy being pursued by bush in Iraq is both illegal and immoral and has no hope of success ...

so where does that leave us in honoring the service of the troops ???

this brings us to the question of asking how we should perceive those who "follow orders" and those who may even BELIEVE that they are fighting for a noble cause ... let's accept that as a premise ... but what, then, is a reasonable conclusion to draw when we believe the ACTS they are asked to perform are both immoral and criminal? what, then, does it mean when one says "i support the troops"?? if the INTENT is noble, to serve the country, to promote democracy in Iraq, to protect America, does this obligate us to honor such service when in reality we believe the DEEDS done by American military personnel are ultimately nothing more than service to the PNAC agenda?

i'm sick and tired of bush wrapping himself in America's soldiers ... in the end, i am highly critical of the MISSION these soldiers are performing no matter how well INTENDED they may be ... i wish them a quick and safe return ... i can honor the BELIEFS of those troops who value protecting America and fighting against tyranny; i cannot, however, honor their ACTIONS which do neither ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. Great post HamstersFromHell.. This should be on the greatest!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 16th 2024, 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC