Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

200 teachers sign ad asking that Churchill inquiry be dropped

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 08:02 PM
Original message
200 teachers sign ad asking that Churchill inquiry be dropped
200 teachers sign ad asking that Churchill inquiry be dropped


posted by: Dan Werner (Web producer)

Created: 2/26/2005 11:54 AM MST -

Updated: 2/26/2005 12:51 PM MST





BOULDER, Colo. (AP) -A full-page ad taken out by 200 University of Colorado faculty members calls for the school to drop inquiry into the writings of professor Ward Churchill.

Gov. Bill Owens and others have called for the firing of Churchill, a tenured professor, because of his comparison of Sept. 11 victims to Nazis.

The faculty members paid for the ad to run Monday in The Boulder Daily Camera.

It says the review of the professor, expected to complete by the middle of March, should be stopped immediately. The ad says the inquiry is the result of political pressure and not based on "any prior formal complaint of specific professional or academic misconduct on his part."

The 200 faculty members' statement defends Churchill's "right to speak what he believes to be the truth" based on academic freedom rules designed to prevent faculty members from being fired for unpopular views.


>snip<


LeCompte and the other teachers who signed the ad paid $1,600 to have it published.

"We're all thinking twice about what we're saying," LeCompte said, recalling the climate in the McCarthy era when professors were fired for alleged communist ties.







http://www.9news.com/acm_news.aspx?OSGNAME=KUSA&IKOBJECTID=5005756a-0abe-421a-0074-4b31c27f7ab0&TEMPLATEID=0c76dce6-ac1f-02d8-0047-c589c01ca7bf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've not weighed in on all these discussions, but today over coffee with
a very good and sincere progressive DEM friend, I got an earful of how successful the media campaign has apparently been in presenting the evil caricature portrayal. And, though she admitted she'd not read his writing in context, at this point it is too late to change her opinion.

I may be one of the few remaining who has not made a final judgement one way or the other on this whole issue, beyond being very concerned at how the REPUGS were manipulating it toward their larger goal of wiping out tenure and any other protections for opposing viewpoints in academia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Probably something they wanted to do for a long time
gag free speech of those radical professors. And it is having that affect. Can't have them teaching critical thinking, can we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enquiringkitty Donating Member (721 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Anytime a government wants to brainwash it's citizens, first it must
silence it's intellectuals, writers, and professors because they have a combination of facts that have not been twisted by the government and the ability to state new ideas .... they keep the population asking questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't know that I would call Ward Churchill an intellectual.
I would call him a fanatic and a lunatic. I'm sorry, not every left of center type is worth defending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. First they came for the lunatics . . .
. . . but I was not a lunatic, so I said nothing. . . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthSideCubsFan Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's going to be tough to defend Churchill
if it turns out that any substantial amount of his academic credentials are bogus.

We are not exactly taking about someone in the Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn class here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. No, you don't have to defend the fanatic,
but should defend his right to speak out and criticize his govt. First, they came for the teachers.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 16th 2024, 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC