Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Social Security "will be bust in 10 years unless there are some changes."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 09:19 PM
Original message
Social Security "will be bust in 10 years unless there are some changes."
Edited on Sat Feb-26-05 10:17 PM by KrazyKat
The Chimp made this claim during a campaign in 1978 -- 27 years ago. He was a liar then. Anyone with half a brain should know that he's lying now. :grr: Anyone with a full brain should know that he's lying all the time. :grr:

* = All Lies, All the Time.
- - - - -
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/27/politics/27social.html?hp&ex=1109480400&en=0a958f02348dd46b&ei=5094&partner=homepage
For Bush, a Long Embrace of Social Security Plan
New York Times
Published: February 27, 2005
<snip>
Mr. Bush had long been intrigued by the idea of allowing workers to put part of their Social Security taxes into stocks and bonds. One Tuesday in the summer of 1978, in the heat of his unsuccessful race for a House seat from West Texas, Mr. Bush went to Midland Country Club to give a campaign speech to local real estate agents and discussed the issue in terms not much different from those he uses now.

Social Security "will be bust in 10 years unless there are some changes," he said, according to an account published the next day in The Midland Reporter-Telegram.
<snip>
on edit: added link (registration required)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BRLIB Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. This could partly explain this piece of Fecal Matter's
fetish with Social Security, which then leaves a vacuum regarding an explanation for his "bald head" fetish.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, wait a second. In 1978, that may have been right.....
remember the huge payroll tax increases didn't occur until 1983.

But I bet if you go to reports in 1983, the trust fund was going to be bust by NOW, instead of 2018. The Sunday NYT magazine had a very good article on how predictions have been more than pessimistic and turned out wrong since the seventies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm sure that * didn't have payroll taxes in mind when he spoke of changes
He, like the rest of his right-wing ilk, has been a rabid privatizer of all things. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC