|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 01:59 PM Original message |
If Hillary's the pick for 2008, I'm NOT voting for her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Randi_Listener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. We need a semi-rabid fucking protest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
queeg (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
2. That's ok, I'll vote twice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:02 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Is voting twice allowed in Texas? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
queeg (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. I figure my last two votes weren't counted so I get an extra one next time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
3. Ahhh, so you're for Condaleeza Rice as president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Oh yeah.... that's the ticket... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:06 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Well, that'll probably be the choice before you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. If that's the case, looks like I'll be staying home on election day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:14 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. What if it was Clinton vs. Todd-Whitman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:14 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. Ah well, I'll be out working to get her the nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kilroy003 (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:14 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. You guys forget that Iowans and the good folk of New Hampshire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Calvinist Basset (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:29 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. Excuse me . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kilroy003 (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:33 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. No offense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:00 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Iowa wavers some. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
25. No way. It's going to be Jeb Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:22 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. He won't go up against Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 04:41 PM Response to Reply #26 |
59. Maybe -- if, and only if, the blackbox voting problems are corrected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KnowerOfLogic (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
35. Right; that's the problem!!! The present dem leadership sucks; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 04:02 PM Response to Reply #35 |
54. HILLARY CLINTON IS NOT REPUKE LITE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone Pawn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 05:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
65. They're also "pushing" Giuliani, McCain, and Jeb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. Hillary is an invitation for defeat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
4. Just like you voted for Nader in 2000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. I voted for Nader in 2000? And you can prove it I presume? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 04:49 PM Response to Reply #11 |
61. No, I just thought you might make a habit of wasting your vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KnowerOfLogic (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
36. I voted Gore in 2000; Nader in 2004, and i'll vote for him again in 2008 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:33 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. yours is lost vote anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone Pawn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 05:01 PM Response to Reply #36 |
66. Oh, good, you threw away your vote in '04? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
6. Whatever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. Yep... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
8. As a hockey fan, are you sure that's not Hockey Withdrawal talking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
9. I like her on many things, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:10 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. It seems like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:13 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Not all. I don't think Kerry supported it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:45 PM Response to Reply #17 |
31. I know, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tjdee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
14. You won't have to, which is the point of nominating her in the first place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Itsthetruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
24. But What If ......? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:04 PM Response to Reply #14 |
33. Why I don't like Hillary, and who I like better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
22. congratulations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
23. "end of story" An easy exit is no substitute for a reasonable explanation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
27. Way too early to be worked up. By 2008, we'll have all new leaders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:17 PM Response to Reply #27 |
38. Good point. We may be choosing from people we haven't heard of yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
28. much as i dislike it, i'll hold my nose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KnowerOfLogic (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
34. Me neither. Dems think they can nominate a war-mongering, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neverforget (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
37. Don't worry. Whoever you support someone else won't vote for them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:20 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. But it's up to us Democrats to wound Hillary long before 2008. We are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neverforget (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:26 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. The left flank should be secure for the candidate after 8 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
40. ditto |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
41. I will vote for whoever the DEM candidate is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnnInLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 04:57 PM Response to Reply #41 |
63. Ditto.....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Malva Zebrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
43. I cannot vote again for anyone who gave Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tactical Progressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
44. If it's anybody but Hillary, I'm voting Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cry baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
46. Why are we talking about 08? WE NEED TO FOCUS ON 06. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tactical Progressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:40 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. I agree wholeheartedly on 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cry baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:49 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. You're right TP, this headstsrong, brilliant group has got to get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tactical Progressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
47. How about, and I know this is RADICAL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stirk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
48. Me neither. I won't vote for any more insider, pro-war Dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
49. I take it you are independant, not DEM? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Emboldened Chimp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
50. What are your reasons? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zinfandel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
53. No way will I vote for her! I sent her donations (I live in CA) mostly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tactical Progressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 04:08 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Bush is a moderate, govern-from-the-middle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zinfandel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 04:11 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. You'll be happy..I'm sure she'll run and, of course, lose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tactical Progressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 04:23 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Yes, she is a soulless bitch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaPera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 05:20 PM Response to Reply #57 |
68. Tell me what are her liberal policies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tactical Progressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 05:28 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. I've seen a few instances |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
58. Hillary can't possibly win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
60. I'm with you devilgrrl. Just another DLC pol selling herself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
62. Nice post without any information or reasoning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
errorbells (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 05:14 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. re:"Nice post without any information or reasoning." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
64. Deleted message |
LiberallyInclined (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
69. Same here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-28-05 05:33 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. WTF are you talking about??!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC