They’ve already created the backstory.Four days before Arnold announced, the Washington Times reported that the Bush/Cheney team thinks they can
win CA and NY in 2004.
The next step: get a Republican electedThey dumped the man who funded the recall to the tune of $2 million of his own funds (Congressman Darrell Issa), to run an action figure who comes complete with his own built-in name recognition, money, and automatic media coverage from a star-struck press. Sure, they had Arnold in their sites since at least
April of this year, though the plan was
originally for
2004. They had to muzzle him not long after his announcement, though, to save him from himself, and have been reminded that he comes with some of the same Enron baggage as Gray Davis.
Still, it could work.
Especially if the recall ballot just happens, by sheer coincidence, to be the biggest and best vote suppression technique in history, something that always disadvantages Democrats. With 135 names listed in random order on the ballot, voting will be a chaotic nightmare, and many people won’t bother or won’t have the time or patience to tough it out. Think moms with hungry children in tow, workers docked by the hour, elderly folks with bad knees.
Next: Send Bush – and plenty of pork – to California.They’ve already promised to make a big play for California. Add some federal largesse, some cooperative or merely biased pollsters to ask the right questions of the right people (or interpret the data favorably) and little by little Bush will look like he’s moving up in the polls and viable. That alone will convince some to vote for the “popular guy.”
Finally, cook the books. The recall election will have been debacle enough (think Florida 2000 on steroids) that despite the fact that Californians are even now being
warned about them, everyone will be clamoring for computerized voting. And what a relief for Rove&Co., since electronic voting systems, owned by
Republicans, have provided some of the most stunning Republican victories* in history. Voila! Bush wins California! Another Rove coup.
*See for example Senator
Chuck Hagel, victories by Republicans Perdue and Chambliss in GA despite no change in demographic turnout, Allard in CO and Coleman in MN, Riley in AL, and three different Republican candidates in Comal County, TX, who each won by exactly 18,181 votes in 2002.
Even MORE Voting Irregularities with computerized voting systems http://www.workersrighttovote.org/more.htmhttp://blackboxvoting.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=12http://pub103.ezboard.com/bsoldiervoicehttp://www.csl.sri.com/users/neumann/illustrative.html#24http://www.thewe.cc/contents/more/archive/july2003/kewearchive_july1-14_2003.htmlCONFLICTS OF INTEREST? You bet.http://www.ecotalk.org/VotingMachineCompanies.htm#DIEBOLD%20ELECTION%20SYSTEMS,%20INCESSENTIAL READING: How safe are computerized voting machines? Not at all:
PIMA COUNTY (AZ) REPORT:
http://www.pimademocrats.org/votingreport/votingintegrity.htmHOPKINS/RICE REPORT:
http://avirubin.com/vote.pdf)
Diebold Rebuttal to Hopkins Report:
http://www.diebold.com/checksandbalances.pdfRubin et. al. - response to Diebold rebuttal:
http://avirubin.com/vote/response.htmlHARRIS REPORT (and other articles by Harris):
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/access-diebold.htmADDITIONAL RESOURCES:BlackboxVoting:
http://www.blackboxvoting.com and
http://www.blackboxvoting.orgDr. Roberta Mercuri:
http://www.notablesoftware.com/evote.htmlLynn Landes website:
http://www.ecotalk.org/VotingMachines-TechnicalIssues&Standards.htmDr. David Dill’s Verified Voting:
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/drefaq.aspCalTech/MIT report:
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2001/voting2facts.html