Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whoda thunk it? Annthrax gets one right!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
OldSoldier Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 12:48 PM
Original message
Whoda thunk it? Annthrax gets one right!
In her latest incomprehensible rant is this little sliver of truth:

"On the basis of their recent pronouncements, the position of the Democratic Party seems to be that Saddam Hussein did not hit us on 9-11, but Halliburton did."

And I thought the woman didn't have an honest bone in her body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. She's a friggin lunatic....
She love trumpeting the whole "Democrats love Hussein" angle...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoneStarLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If You Really Want To Anger A Republican On That One...
...just remind them that they and their Godfather Reagan loved him more and loved him first!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meph Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. oh yes,
We love Saddam so much, that's why it took a Republican administration to make him the man he became.

And I don't see what Ann's point is. Does she think that Saddam was the one behind 9/11 because last I checked even kindergardeners knew it was Osama Bin Laden. But then, this is Ann Coulter, in her mind anyone with bronze colored skin was responsible for 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. But if the terrorists had just hit liberal targets....
You know, like the NY Times, or Cornell University. Too bad U of M can't take back her law degree, she's an embarrassment to a good school.

Next time she criticizes affirmative action, I hope someone will ask her if she ever thinks that perhaps there's some white male with better grades than her that didn't get into UM law school because she got preference for being a woman. Wouldn't that cheapen her degree? Make her feel like she didn't really earn her status? Bill Maher, are you reading this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandWatie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. She's smarter than that
I know damn well she knows that Hussein didn't have shit to do with the attacks on the WTC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Halliburton may not have hit us on 9-11 but they sure the hell have since
then. We are getting hit harder each and every day while they laugh all the way to the bank. They are receiving directly from the US government (us) almost $2 billion per month at this very moment and it is growing by leaps and bounds. I wish my entire state could receive $2 billion dollars period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pltcl_jnky Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. well
if they are making that much money why not invest in them and use that money to support someone else????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC