Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This manufactured Kerry 'controversy'...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 01:03 PM
Original message
This manufactured Kerry 'controversy'...
Edited on Fri Sep-12-03 01:08 PM by Patriot_Spear
I'm a Dean supporter, but nothing ticks me off more than when a chickenhawk or a Repuke (normally the same thing) has the audacity to question the service record of a veteran, especially a man like John Kerry.

Now the 'usual suspects' on here wanted to drag this around in GD for a while and this bothered me a bit; I have serious reservations about the character of ANYONE who would stoop to this kind of slander without definative, unbiased evidence. But after reflecting, I think we could use this type of ugly accusation to examine how easily it can backfire.

Baseless attacks like this one anger regular Americans, and nothing outrages the People more than an attack on a decorated veteran. If this board is any indicator, attacking Kerry in this manner would result in massive support for Kerry and disgust toward the accuser.

Like I said I'm a Dean supporter, but it's fairly universally accepted that attacking a combat veteran's record is just low. In this regard, I think the DU weathervane has the pulse of the nation.

The bottom line for me is, guys like John Kerry and Max Cleland deserve better than these kind of filthy attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Even more astounding
is how the admin lets their own board be used by these chickenshit liars under the excuse that they can't check the veracity of every statement that's posted.

That excuse is itself a lie! They may not be able to check EVERY statement, but when a DUer posts disruptive lies day after day, it doesn't take all that much effort to deal with that poster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. I purposely didn't post to those threads
even to condemn them in the hopes they would die a quick death. I wholeheartedly agree with you, PS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's more about this very subject here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. BRAVO!
I have been following these threads too and they have really become awful. What is really bad is that they suck the positive energy out of GD. So many well meaning DU'ers feel that they must respond to some of this crap. Thus, other good discussions don't get going.

Here is what I suggest and it's not my idea...do the "yawn" thing with these folks and then let's start some discussions about what the next democratically elected Democrat should do to get this country back on the right track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxomai_vs_rove Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Totally agreed
Although I take a different tactic. I call them liars to their faces, because frankly, that's what a lot of these folks are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's astounding
One guy I know says 'I didn't see any combat, I just flew in airplanes and dropped the lights so everybody else could kill each other.' I forget what those 'lights' are called, he actually called them by name. Another served on a mine sweeper of some sort. They both still consider that they served and I've never heard anybody say anything different until yesterday.

My cousin's son is on the Nimitz in the Gulf, although it may have moved by now.

One uncle was in England in WWII working as a mechanic. The other was in the Pacific and got shot later in Korea. We don't consider the service of one or the other 'more heroic'. They don't either. Truthfully, it's not much discussed at all in our family, we aren't really that big on military service.

The essence of this discussion is the reason Democrats lose elections.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC