Am I reading this recall decision too cynically?
vi5
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-03 12:39 PM
Original message |
Am I reading this recall decision too cynically? |
|
Just seems like Arnold and Mclintock were both behind in the poll and the recall itself was losing support. So now it seems like all of a sudden the courts decided to postpone it? Seems like now they have more time to convince McLintock to get out of the race and to sell the recall itself some more.
Just a tinfoil hat suspicion though. I don't know enough about the situation.
|
nothingshocksmeanymore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-03 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
1. March favors Dems regardless with the Dem primaries and the |
|
fact that we maintain a decent voter registration edge.
|
TheBlob
(805 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-03 12:43 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Yeah it does seem like it can go either way now. |
|
Granted, Dems will be out in force in March, but doesn't this keep Davis in the hot seat for six more months?
|
diplomats
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-03 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. The judges who ruled were appointed by Carter and Clinton |
|
so they certainly aren't right wing.
|
TheBlob
(805 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-03 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
my concern is six months of GOP shenanigans.
|
Bandit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-03 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. If by hot seat you mean Governor ~ Yes it does and happy for it |
|
Davis apparently wants to be in that "hot seat" as you call it because he ran twice for it and is in the process of having to run a third time. The recall process needs to be looked at and some important changes made. Recalls shoulkd be for corruption or illegal activity not because you don't like him. Elections are for that.
|
TheBlob
(805 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-03 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. By hot seat I mean that a duly elected Governor will be distracted |
|
for another six months by this bullshit. I'm not in California but it seems like this guy is getting screwed. How can anyone do their job if they have to spend their entire time in office fighting to KEEP their job?
|
David__77
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-03 12:43 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Yes, that cynicism is unwarrented. |
|
These judges definitely did not rule on this basis at all. There are strategic advantages and weaknesses in either event. We must be prepared to win in either case.
|
ElsewheresDaughter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-03 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. this ruling allows Diebold and ES&S fixed machines to win for repukes |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-15-03 12:54 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
your cynism is warranted...i'm with you there
|
arcane1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-03 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. exactly, the whole point of the delay is to hook us up |
|
now would be a good time to start writing our reps, especially if you live in one of the relevant counties, and DEMAND a voter-verified paper trail!!!!
BBV is the one issue that worries me the most about this recall
|
nothingshocksmeanymore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-03 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Esxcept that to my knowledge Shelley has been pushing for a paper |
|
trail. Is that not correct?
|
Clete
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-15-03 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. Yes, this would give BevHarris more time to |
|
get the message out about the touch screen voting machines inviting fraud and ballot tampering. I would like to see double entry voting accountability by March of next year.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:58 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.