Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Roll call vote on FCC Media Ownership bill: some questions.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 03:46 AM
Original message
Roll call vote on FCC Media Ownership bill: some questions.
I was checking out the roll call vote on the FCC Media Ownership bill and some of the Republicans that voted YES surprised me. Take a look:

YEA
Democrats: all except 6
Republicans: Alexander (TN), Allard (CO), Chafee (RI), Collins (ME), Dole (NC), Enzi (WY), Hutchinson (TX), Lott (MS), Roberts (KS), Shelby (AL), Snowe (ME), Voinovich (OH).

NAY
Democrats: Miller (GA), Breaux (LA)



Some of the Republicans are not surprising... Chafee, Snowe, Voinovich... but Hutchinson?? Lott?? Shelby??

They usually don't break the party line... any ideas on why they voted this way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hutchinson has a nit to pick
He does not like Democratic Gloria Tristani being a commissioner on the FCC. So that is not a surprise.

One down, two to go.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. it's Kay Bailey-Hutchinson...
not Tim Hutchinson ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. You got me courious, so I looked
Seems it is personal with Lott. Back six years ago, Lott wanted to set the pug side of the FCC. He was rebuffed. The FCC has two dems and two pugs and a leader chosen by the pres (that word would be capitalized and fully and respectfully spelled out in a real world). The two pug positions were open and Lott lended support for two candidates. They were not accepted. Someone has a long memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. very interesting! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe some of them are counting on the House killing it?
That's what the Republiclan House leadership has promised.

The Senate has always been a different animal anyway and sometimes likes to "check" the executive on public policy and assert itself in things that overlap the branches.

Maybe Powell didn't consult with the Communications SubCommittee much, I don't know but this is definitely a slap to the FCC. :-)

There has been a breaking of ranks(Repub) as of late also. It may cost some of the Republicans some campaign bucks, but I don't see it as much of a threat to their reelection.

Who would vote against a candidate over this issue? Dislike of the media crosses party lines after all.

Communications Sub-committee

SubCommittee Chair Conrad Burns(MT)
and Ernest Hollings(SC), Ranking

SubCommittee members

Trent Lott, MS
Kay Bailey Hutchinson, TX
Olympia J. Snowe, ME

John Breaux, LA

with John McCain being the Chairman of the whole Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.


Somewhat surprized that McCain wouldn't cross on this one.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Some good thoughts here
Or it could be that some senators who think they are all that, are just tired of being treated as if they are trained lap dogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddhamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. McCain said...
he would vote NO because he felt it was wrong to cancel the FCC Rule changes without Congress stepping in and fixing the problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. So, if * vetos it, would he vote to overturn? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC