|
Excuse me if this has already been posted; I did a search with a couple of different words and didn't see it.
Earlier today I caught Neal Boortz in one of his usual whiney rants; he was going on about punch-cards vs touchscreen in the CA recall election. I missed the first part of it so wasn't sure what point he was trying to make. A guy (DUer???) called in and filled him in on Bev's website, BlackBoxVoting.com, and how Diebold Corp. is a Repub sponsor and had suspiciously "promised" Bush the election. The caller made a very clear case for the strong possibility of fraud/miscounting/vulnerability with touchscreen machines. Boortz was actually quite interested in these remarks, especially the idea that people had actually gone into the code over the internet; it sounded like he was going to follow up on links that the caller promised to e-mail. Much as I detest Boortz I was impressed at his openness to the whole subject, his refusal to just accept e-voting without some research, and his emphasis on the need for absolutely unbiased and fair voting. He is a slimeball but certain people do listen to him--any publicity of the issue is great. Anyway, caller, if you are reading this, let me congratulate you on some great remarks!
He also went on a whine about Wesley Clark but it wasn't that bad (unlike with Howard Dean, whom he absolutely lies about at every opportunity)--he covered the major RW talking points, esp. the "WWIII" thing (also, falling-out with Pentagon bosses and asked to retire)--but just ticked them off without a lot of hot air. I missed the "WWIII" thing but came back to the car just in time to hear him say something like, "so it's not that big a deal" or something like that.
|