Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What does it mean if the CA Appeals Ct decides election can go forth?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 01:21 PM
Original message
What does it mean if the CA Appeals Ct decides election can go forth?
Edited on Fri Sep-19-03 01:27 PM by kentuck
In effect, they will be saying that the punch card ballots are OK. Hanging chads are OK. The election in Florida has been validated in George Bush's favor because those that complained about the ballots really did not have a legitimate claim? The US Supreme Court was correct in their decision. Is this how the right-wing propagandists that run this country would interpret their decision?

(edit - added word "would")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hee
Edited on Fri Sep-19-03 01:26 PM by fertilizeonarbusto
I think either way the pukes are toast on this one. What does it ultimately mean? Either Davis beats the recall or Bustamante is the new governor. The situation in California is so dire that Arnold's bromides, evasions, show biz razzmatazz and vagueness won't cut it like it could have during good times. People want serious answers, I think, and that's why his campaign flounders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopthegop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I take it you say 'his campaign flounders'
based on poll reports...this is a peeve of mine...why trust polls when they go the way we want (this one) and not when they go the other way (Bush's popularity)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't do that myself
But you must admit he has uniformly sunk in polls across the board. I would call that pretty good preponderance of evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopthegop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. thanks for replying...
didn't mean you specifically...but lots here KNOW polls showing Bush as popular are faked...but believe polls they agree with...just interesting...have a good weekend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You too!
BTW, that behaviour annoys the living hell out of me too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. It can be spun either way - but my take is that
stopping of the vote, followed by a USSC non-review, means the Gove v Bush is now law of the land - despite the do not depend on this wording.

If the Appeal is a reversal and a go ahead, and again no USSC review, it is the opposite ruling by the USSC compared to Gore v Bush - and the USSC is shown to be political.

If the USSC reviews and actually makes a ruling, I lose a bit of money! (never put your money where your mouth is!) :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC