Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Deep Throat Cover Blown, Washington Post Still Sucks" Greg Palast

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 05:14 PM
Original message
"Deep Throat Cover Blown, Washington Post Still Sucks" Greg Palast
Deep Throat Cover Blown
Washington Post Still Sucks

Wednesday, June 1, 2005

By Greg Palast

I've been gagging all morning on the Washington Post's self-congratulatory preening about its glory days of the Watergate investigation.

Think about it. It's been 33 years since cub reporters Woodward and Bernstein pulled down the pants of the Nixon operation and exposed its tie-in to the Watergate burglary. That marks a third of a century since the Washington Post has broken a major investigative story. I got a hint of why the long, dry spell when I met Mark Hosenball, "investigative" reporter for the Washington Post's magazine, Newsweek.

It was in the summer of 2001. A few months earlier, for the Guardian papers of Britain, I'd discovered that Katherine Harris and Governor Jeb Bush of Florida had removed tens of thousands of African-Americans from voter registries before the 2000 election, thereby fixing the race for George Bush. Hosenball said the Post-Newsweek team "looked into it and couldn't find anything."

Nothing at all? What I found noteworthy about the Post's investigation was that "looking into it" involved their reporters chatting with Florida officials -- but not bothering to look at the voter purge list itself. http://www.gregpalast.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Regrettably predictable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Palast is telling it like it is. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Palast pisses off all the right people.
I like that about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. I remember that. Like asking the foxes if they'd been in the henhouse, and
reporting their answer & calling it an investigation. Uh-huh. WaPo will have to do a lot of work to get back their rep. Patting themselves on the back for past glories ain't gonna do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. In 1972 Woodward and Bernstein WEREN"T investigative reporters
for the Washington Post. They were basically flunkies, Woodward was covering the DC city beat -- the courthouse, etc. -- and Bernstein was editing copy. Woodward just happened to be around when the burglars were arrested -- and the rest, they say, is history.

None of the WP's "investigative reporters" did jack on the Watergate story -- that is, until Woodward and Bernstein were promoted AFTER breaking and working the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poverlay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Mr Palast is such a wonderful reporter.
I wish there were a couple like him in America...

I buy all his books and cards.

Keep up the good work Greg!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC