Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jeff Gannon as the Official Bush White House Hooker? SURE! WHY NOT?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 09:57 PM
Original message
Jeff Gannon as the Official Bush White House Hooker? SURE! WHY NOT?
It took down BILL CLINTON.

Come on. We ALLLL know gannon wasn't a reporter; he barely PLAYED at being a reporter. Let's tell it like it is, and THIS is what the White House DOES NOT WANT YOU TO CONCLUDE:

Gannon was the Official Gay Male Hooker.

He was boning BUSH IN THE OVAL OFFICE.

We all know it! So let's SAY it. Let's make them TALK about it. Better yet, let's find someone to pay gannon to CONFESS to it.

Let's make them deny it.

Gannon's pose as a victim is BULLSHIT. If anything, he was paid to pretend he was a wanna-be reporter to cover up his white house ramblings at 2 am.

Notice how everyone is so keen to make sure focus is kept on the lousy press room? That's to keep you from checking how often gannon was boning someone in the oval office.

Oddly, bush's facial abrasions have halted now that gannon isn't a privileged guest.

Comments, derision, thoughts, pies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think the more important issue is how he was cleared.
since he obviously functioned as a propaganda shill, that much is apparent to anyone watching him ask questions...its on video record.
Also on record is the number of his visits to the white house, also it SHOULD be on record how he was cleared.

those are all tangible things, which if conclusively researched and proven, would be more than adequate to smear the white house.

However, the gay male hooker angle, while likely, is relatively unprovable, does not cross public records, and has the negative boomerang effect of making us look like we're homophobic to bring it up. That gives them the opportunity to passive-aggressive the issue and throw it back on us, completely covering the more valid trail.

Listen, bushites are not going to get upset about gay male prostitutes...why, I don't understand, either, since it would seem to be a sticking point for them. However, I believe the national security issue SHOULD resonate with everyone, in a nonpartisan way.

IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pickles
Don't forget Pickles. She used to enjoy engaging Gannon's talents for that occasional, rollicking game of 'car crash.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC