Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The break - the new 'deep throat' if you will - will be from the military

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:28 PM
Original message
The break - the new 'deep throat' if you will - will be from the military
Mr. Felt's self outing has made me again consider where the break in the dam will come. The administration's insiders are all incredibly loyal, and that group is locked down tight.

Some of the RNC top brass are also insiders, so they're part of the lock down group. The rest of the RNC? Clueless syncophants.

The Efungelicals? They're a side show and not part of the equation.

The FBI? Not a chance. Too much of a 'company man' mentality among those who might be in some level of 'the know'. While not insiders, they may have something to share with the country. But even if they chose to, it wouldn't be enough. The cabal has established their own parallel organizations to do the work they would traditionally have had done by the likes of the FBI. Nobody in the FBI today is really an insider.

The Secret Service? Not a chance. These people live and die 'discretion'. In our entire history, not a one of them have ever leaked even a whimper of they've seen. It won't happen now.

The CIA? Now here the worm could well turn. While there's a company man at the top, and he's replaced many of the 'middlers' with other loyalists, there's just too many people who were hired for exactly the same trait that may cause then to turn when abused. They're ..... what's the right word? ...... rogue? No, not exactly. But you know what I mean. So this is a possibility. Especially some of the ones who got their walking papers in Porter Goss' 'Night of the Long Knives" exercise a year or so ago.

The Military? Here's where my money is. The military was lionized by these bastards. But even as they were being lionized, so were they being abused and abused badly. There are many pissed off veterans. There are many leaving the military to join these same veterans. Kerry had a bunch of high level retirees on the stage with him. Guys (and women) who held pretty high positions. Like former CJCS. Guys with friends still on the inside. These people were not anomalies. There are more like them. It just takes one or two.

This Sunday, some military lawyers are going on 60 Minutes to talk about the bullshit that is Gitmo. Abu Gharib is still smoldering. Cuts in VA benefits. Pay inequities. Rumsfeld's tyrannical rule (and overrule) of the military brass, and his inability to accept blame for anything, preferring instead to heap it on the military.

Even if a true sense of patriotism and honor doesn't drive some 4-star to speak clearly, the delicious taste of sweet revenge might. More likely, it will be a combination of the two.

And it won't be a whispered leak to some cub reporter after reading the position of a flag in a flower pot. It will be a brave soldier standing in the glare of television lights speaking truth to usurped power.

God help us all. This cannot happen too soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whatever it is it still won't be covered.
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I believe you're right
Us military folk get cranky when the commander gives illegal orders. And even crankier when the commander denies any knowledge of the order afterwards, and blames the troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. All I can tell you we may see soemthing unprecedented
in US history... can you say civil war (we had that), but what about a Coup?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Funny you mention that .......
I have actually thought that through just a bit. I homestly think it unlikely. But I don't rule it out completely. I suspect the military is pretty fractuous - and factious - these days. There's no doubt there are administration syncophants (can you say Tommy Franks, even though he was abused by Rumsfeld before the war ... go figure). But there have to be many, many of them who just won't be able to deal with this much more.

These are people trained to take orders and execute a mission. All they ask in return is the tools and manpower to do it. They've gotten neither from this bunch, instead getting blame for the cabal's failures. They're also largely very pro country. Patriots, if you will. And they have to know just as we do that this group is neither pro America nor patriotic. An overhwlming sense of duty could drive us to a coup.

And while I hope it never comes to this, if a coup were to happen, people on our side of the spectrum would be the beneficiaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. you may be onto something.. considering I read this earlier
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I can see the cabal replacing him with a more warm and fuzzy type
as a way to placate an ever growing displeasure among our uniformed cadre. I suspect, at this point, it could easily be too little, too late.

The military brass aren't dummies. They can see a scam. Replacing Rummy could have to opposite effect .... giving them (any disgruntled military brass) the freedom to marshall their forces and go public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. The new deep throat has been screaming her head off about
this administration: Sibel Edmonds. (God, I hope I got her name right)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. She's a brave woman and she's been saying the right thing
But the fact is, she's a 'middler'. I truly honor her and her clarion call for righteous indignation and for a true investigation, but she's really small potatoes. She'll only be effective as a corroborator when a really high level person speaks out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Unfortunately, they have her gagged...
and she's seemingly the only one who's not an insider to have her special knowledge.

We need a way to let her speak, she wants to.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I completely agree
If only they'd allow it ..... or we can force it in congress, somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Can John Conyers force Sibel Edmonds to speak?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. I'm not sure. I think it needs to be bipartisan or only the leadership
can empower a panel with subpoena power.

Any congressional scholars know the answer to that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. I thought it had to be the court
that imposed the order, or one of the appeals courts in its chain.

I don't think that congress can over-ride it, unless they pass a law specifically for her case, which would have to be veto proof.

Gag orders to keep evidence of wrongdoing suppressed should be illegal.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. That makes sense ....... I'm sure if there was some way
for the congressional minority to get her to speak, it would already have happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Funny that she did testify in closed session
at the 911 commission. She wasn't able to tell all there. All her allegations in that testimony were supported by the IG office. Yet nothing happens.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. From your lips... I hope you're right. And it can't
happen too soon. I just hope there's someone out there who is fed up enough to fess up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I'm actually hoping one of the recent hgh level retirees can coax a
new retiree or one ready to retire into speaking up. People like Wes Clark, Tony McPeak, John Shalikashvili ......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. How about Colin Powell? You think he'd do it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Well, its possible. After all, he has a reputation that needs help
I have to wonder if this isn't why idiot son broke bread with Colin and Alma as Casa Powell last week. That visit was ........ uh ...... unusual to say the least. He limos over from Casa Bianco to their minimanse to have supper? And they get a photo op on the Powell's front stoop?

Strange shit .......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillysuse Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. The 4 Star speaking truth to Power
There already is a 4 Star retired General speaking truth
to power - Ret General Wesley K Clark.
You may have missed his Democratic response to Bush last
Saturday.
It's available on www.securingamerica.com

And I hope others from the military come back from Iraq and
continue to speak out as so many of our veterans are doing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. Clkark *might* be able to do it. But on the other hand
it would be waaaaaay too easy to paint it as a purely political hit job, what with him still having presidential aspirations.

Now .... if Clark could be the one who persuades a recent retiree ..... or even Colin Powell ..... to come forward and speak, that would be great on several fronts. It gets the story out there and Clark gets a HUGE boost to his presidential bid, if that's where he's going.

PS: I like Clark a lot too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coffeenap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. Powell should be the one--has all the info and was treated like and
turned into s**t. All for loyalty misplaced, military style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I'm not sure the chance for this is dead
Why was idiot son over the Colin and Wilma's for dinner the other evening? A little 'damage control' maybe?

Could some of his more honest fellow retirees coax the guy into coming clean?

Stranger things have happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. Drop some telephone lines on Hackworth's grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarchy1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
17. We can only hope you are right. We've been reading it for months, only
Edited on Sat Jun-04-05 12:26 AM by anarchy1999
time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. I'd like to think you're right, but there's been at least 2 major
purges of the top military brass. Pickins might be slim. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. It seems clear that the military top brass are being 'purged', but
Edited on Sat Jun-04-05 09:29 AM by Husb2Sparkly
the purgees have to be replaced. And who's there to replace them? Not all are in lock step. Military guys stay military guys by not being overt about their political thinking and political leanings. The more they're cowed by the civilian leadership, the more likely they are (from a purely human nature perspective, at least) to keep their views hidden, making it tough for the civilian leadership to know *who* to promote to fill the places of the purged.

Rinse and repeat .....

I think there will *always* be military officers who could have the potential to rat out shit from about.

And if you think about it, the recently purged would also be a source of insider knowledge. If needed, they could also get the guys who are still in, and who served directly below them, and who have current knowledge, to corroborate or add to anything the actual purgee might have to say.

The lid simply can NOT stay on tightly. There's just too many people who know for sure or who can make the potential case that some very bad shit went down knowingly and maliciously by the civilian leadership.

<on edit ..... pretty much this same case can be made for the potential of a leak from the purged CIA guys.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. It's feels like we're sitting on a powder keg,
waiting for someone to turn. Let's hope you're right about it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
25. I agree with your assessment.
Not sure how it will play out though. We'll just have to wait-n-see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
29. Don't forget Karen Kwiatkowski
Air Force Lt Colonel, now retired, spoke a lot about her days at the Pentagon and how the neocons made her change intelligence reports

http://www.lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski-arch.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Oh yes, I DO remember her
Edited on Sat Jun-04-05 01:50 PM by Husb2Sparkly
But in many ways she's like Sibel Edmonds. A credible source. Excellent matters to speak to and bring before the public.

But also like Sibel Edmonds, a 'middler' ..... simply not high enough on the food chain to do it all on her own credentials.

We need a four star type to get the ball rolling. She and Edmonds, and (what was that woman's name from the FBI who is now running for congress?) and others who've spoken out. They're the chorus line waiting for the diva to take the stage.

Funny thing .... they're all women ...... that just dawned on me!

Who else would be part of this chorus line?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC