Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We did increase bombing on prewar Iraq to incite them

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 07:10 AM
Original message
We did increase bombing on prewar Iraq to incite them
I was in the USAF at time, I saw it myself.

I figured out that we planned to attack them and use their response to our attacks as a pretext.

Add that with the mythical WMDs and what do you get?

18,000 dead and injured Americans and countless numbers of innocent victims in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Unfortunately...
... I cannot remember the name of the general who mentioned, just in passing before the beginning of the Iraq invasion, that we'd run something near 250,000 sorties during the time between the end of the Gulf War and the beginning of the invasion.

Since Iraq had virtually no aircraft available for operation--in the no-fly zones or anywhere else, for that matter--that meant running about 55-60 sorties per day, every day, for twelve years, much of that meant to probe and destroy Iraqi air defenses, under the guise of patrolling the no-fly zones (and that activity being wholly the idea of the US and the UK, operating completely outside the auspices of and approval of the UN).

No question about it--the object of such missions was to make Iraq incapable of resisting an eventual invasion by the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. The raids were
reported in newspapers at the time, although only a few column inches and not much detail. There were links on DU and some DUers predicted that the raids were actually the real beginning of the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Here's a link, just for you!!!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1825941

"Rear Admiral David Gove, former deputy director of global operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said on November 20, 2002, that US and British pilots were "essentially flying combat missions." On October 3, 2002, the New York Times reported that US pilots were using southern Iraq for "practice runs, mock strikes and real attacks" against a variety of targets. But the full significance of this dramatic change in policy toward Iraq only became clear last month, with the release of the Downing Street memo. In it, British Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon is reported to have said in 2002, after meeting with US officials, that "the US had already begun 'spikes of activity' to put pressure on the regime," a reference to the stepped-up airstrikes. Now the Sunday Times of London has revealed that these spikes "had become a full air offensive"--in other words, a war."

DOWNING STREET MINUTES - OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT MINUTES OF AN OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT MEETING




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. As if by magic!
Thank you, good link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hey, We Were Just Prepping The Battle Space!!!
My God Scorpio! You are so cynical sometimes!!!:evilgrin:

You must hate America!!!

Love it or leave it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. Which is a war crime. But then, the "no-fly zones" were a war crime.
USA; leader in war crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Trying for a new Gulf of Tonkin Incident...
Edited on Sat Jun-04-05 11:27 AM by JHB
Google "Gulf of Tonkin Incident" for the details, but basically the CIA and the Navy (under orders from above) provoked a brief shooting incident with North Vietnamese coastal gunboats, and in Washington this was spun as an unprovoked, sustained attack by NV against US Navy ships in international waters. It provided the political cover needed to get congress to agree to let the president send in combat forces (not just "advisors"), in quantity.

It would have made things sooooo much simpler for * if Saddam had shot down one of our planes, or better yet fired some scuds at our airbases... Wonder how upset Chim-Chim was that he didn't/couldn't do it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Wonder if
the pilots knew they were bait for a casus belli?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC