Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My Editorial on the Religious Right: What do you think?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
true_notes Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 02:30 AM
Original message
My Editorial on the Religious Right: What do you think?
The Lunacy of the Religious Right

In the course of history, humans have been a progressive species. From the time of the wheel to the computer age, we have adapted to changes in our lives, surroundings and evolution of intellectual growth. Forward thinking, acting, and progression are human traits, and ultimately what separates us from beast. These actions mostly benefit us, through research and education, but to a certain few it offends. It offends because it in itself is a paradigm of this forward thinking, but of a different, archaic age.

In this time an eternal constitution was set forth. One that was truly, and at the same time falsely divine. Its system of control was and still is fear. Fear that there is something worse than what is experienced on Earth can be found in the afterlife. With fear comes obedience, and with obedience comes a following of epic proportions.

This following of organized religion still exists to this day. As humans progress through the ages, forging new frontiers, there is a constant friction against our instinctive mission in life. This mindless scourge is no more present in the United States than it is in Afghanistan.

Religious extremism has the identity of a Muslim with the Koran firmly grasped in his hands while he blows himself and 30 others on a bus up. With this being a completely arrogant and false judgment from westerners, the action of refusing to realize that religious extremism has many faces is becoming a detriment to our progression as a nation. The growing religious movement in the United States is beginning to forge a new style of politics, one that is dangerous and very controversial.

The selfishness of religious right in this country is bound in determination to bring the notion of liberty and justice for all to a fiery reappraisal. Regression is the keyword of the religious right, regression to more than 2000 years ago but with modern messages of how theoretical powers to be can rule a nation. Has America lost all hope in everything else, to where we have to revert to talking to air for hope and inspiration?

Outcries for a more moderate movement should be listened to and heeded. The United States is slowly congregation by congregation is becoming a Theocratic stronghold. The solution to this problem is the Separation of Church and State, which is not included in the constitution, but should rightfully be included. It is a logical way of thinking, and keeps the immorality of making the masses suffer for a minority’s just cause.

With a more and more conservative America, comes a more and more oppressed and dim way of thinking. The ways of today mold the ways tomorrow’s generation will think. With that said, do we, as a society need to give our next generations the best science, technology, conservation and intellectual achievements? Out of that favor of that argument, it looks as if we will just hand them an old set of ancient, false laws and a bleak hope of a fortified tomorrow. The thoughts that we, as humans, animals, and carbon life forms are nothing but dust in the wind should be reversed to a new special meaning, one that means we matter, and are respected in the cycle of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
James T. Kirk Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Church and State
"The solution to this problem is the Separation of Church and State, which is not included in the constitution, but should rightfully be included."

Have you read this part of the U.S. constitution?

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Congress is not allowed to establish a church and is not allowed to stop the people from worhipping as they please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
true_notes Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Right BUT...
There is NOTHING actually saying the church and state shall be seperated. It's an idea, but not on paper. Look at Shah Bush, he has brought God into politics and mainstream GOP agenda. This is what I'm trying to get at. We need it in black and white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
James T. Kirk Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. God has always been in politics.
Bushhas done many things worth criticizing, but he has not tried to establish a national church (as they have in England, for example).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Somawas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. So "No law respecting an establishment"
does not mean "No law"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnmod Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. But...
<i>Congress is not allowed to establish a church and is not allowed to stop the people from worhipping as they please.</i>
<p>
This is not saying the two are seperate the way its practiced in America..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
James T. Kirk Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. And they should not be.
Abe Lincoln had strong religous beliefs and thank God he did! What a mess we'd be in without him!

I also have religous beliefs that influence everything, including my political beliefs.

Anyone can be elected regardless of religous beliefs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good editorial!
Edited on Sun Jun-05-05 04:29 PM by Pushed To The Left
Like somebody else brought up, I think the first amendment takes care of church-state separation. I saw a sticker at an Americans United presentation that reads "The Religious Right Is Neither". I am suspicious that some members of the religious right might not be all that spiritual, and they are simply using religion as a powerful tool to manipulate people into supporting their agenda. I think a separation of church and state would actually protect religion from being used and abused by the right wing!

www.au.org
www.aclu.org
www.pfaw.org
www.tolerance.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fifth of Five Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. Article VI of the Constitution
There's also Article VI of the constitution which states:

Clause 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

In other words ... anyone of any faith (or no faith) is eligible to hold any federal office. If the founding fathers had intended to create a theocracy, or establish our government as based on Christianity, wouldn't they have made it a requirement that all federal office holders be Christian?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC