|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
sabra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 08:55 AM Original message |
RW best counter to DSM, "Downing Street Memo is old news" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meegbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
1. The DSM is sooooo yesterday! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
2. Conservative morons voted for bush in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
getmeouttahere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
3. All the more reason to keep talking about it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nightfox02 (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
4. well...the dems are going to shove that "old news.." so far up their ass.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
5. Those minutes prove the one thing the RW could avoid: intent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goldeneye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
6. We should keep a running list of their attempts to get rid of dsm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nightfox02 (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:07 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. with the exception of #1 which i dont quite understand... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goldeneye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:33 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. They were trying to make it sound like fixing intelligence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PuraVidaDreamin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:18 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Sexed UP! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:29 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. good idea, I have been keep tabs myself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eShirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:54 AM Response to Reply #6 |
17. "hearsay" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goldeneye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 10:02 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. thanks...I'll see if I can edit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 10:01 AM Response to Reply #6 |
19. Here's a list I made of talking points I've heard so far... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stirk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 01:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
27. It's also an "internet rumor", according to that fellow on C-SPAN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
8. Notice that the National Review article is dated today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WLKjr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
12. It's been discredited... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:37 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Yeah, I noticed that too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WLKjr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:47 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. notice his eyes to start shifting uncontrollably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:57 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Oh shit I missed that...reaction was shit himself egh? LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WLKjr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 11:29 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. that's what it looked like to me, here let me describe it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 01:44 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. OMG Just saw your answer! This I would have paid to see! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
14. Unfortunately, that quote is all they need. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zanne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 10:06 AM Response to Reply #14 |
22. This was released in England ONE WEEK before elections... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 01:53 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. Obviously a new non-partisan judiciary is required. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
16. So is Saddam using WMD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
20. DSM doesn't exist in a vacuum: Bolton, Wilson, Richard Clark tie into this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
25. By the time Nixon resigned in August 1974, 'Watergate' was old news.(nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 01:47 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. excellent point, and comeback. I like it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-05 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
28. They are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:56 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC