Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Facing Recruiting Crisis, Military Lowers Its Standards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 07:16 PM
Original message
Facing Recruiting Crisis, Military Lowers Its Standards
I apologize if this has been posted before.

Link: http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1499164,00.html

The US military has stopped battalion commanders from dismissing new recruits for drug abuse, alcohol, poor fitness and pregnancy in an attempt to halt the rising attrition rate in an army under growing strain as a result of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

An internal memo sent to senior commanders said the growing dropout rate was "a matter of great concern" in an army at war. It told officers: "We need your concerted effort to reverse the negative trend. By reducing attrition 1%, we can save up to 3,000 initial-term soldiers. That's 3,000 more soldiers in our formations."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, Bill Maher was right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because conservatives are chickenshits
who will not enlist and do the patriotic thing, the Army is looking more and more conservative every day. Overweight drug abusers who can't do their job. Rather limbaughesgue wouldn't you say? The only thing rush knows how to do is hate other human beings, he has been a failure at every other endeavor.

Thankyou conservatives for supporting a war you choose not to fight and in turn are fucking our Army recruiters and field commanders.

It must really suck being a conservative today.

Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And what happens when we run low on second - rate enlistees ?
a Bush Youth Korps ? a Neocon Volksstrum ? Press gangs ? or, ( dare I say it ?),
a draft ? I am glad I am already a veteran from decades past. I feel for anyone signing up now.

I think the Chimp administration has almost run the All Volunteer into the ground... maybe a little bit further at that. Since this gang will exploit whom ever they get their hands on to continue this war for oil, the Army is a tough sell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Nah
You can't have a draft because Bush said there will be no draft! Say you're wrong because Bush is always right!!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Just wait for the first miscarriages to occur in boot camp
If that doesn't get those fetus fetishists scratching the points on their heads, nothing will.

Abortion by boot camp!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatostrophicSS Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "Just wait for the first miscarriages to occur in boot camp"
Edited on Mon Jun-06-05 09:49 PM by CatostrophicSS





I'll be waiting for the liberal media to jump on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC