Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dirty politics in AZ? (Unexpected Dean Y1 deferrment story)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Sal316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:04 PM
Original message
Dirty politics in AZ? (Unexpected Dean Y1 deferrment story)
Edited on Sun Sep-21-03 09:05 PM by Sal316
Ok all you campaign savvy DU'ers, I have a question for you. I was reading this morning's Arizona Republic and saw this story...

<snip>
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0921dean-draft21.html
Back ailment got Dean Vietnam draft deferment

Candidate says the government made decision on his status

Sarah Schweitzer and Tatsha Robertson
Boston Globe
Sept. 21, 2003 12:00 AM

<snip>

Now I know most DU'ers know this story. My question is... why did this all of a sudden come out and is there a significance to the Boston Globe byline. Now let me state this very clearly...

I DO NOT BELIEVE KERRY'S CAMP SET THIS UP.

Even to my apolitical Dad this smelled like a setup. The article does mention one or two lines about *'s "service" in the National Guard. My Dad thinks, and I believe, that someone in *'s camp leaked this story to the Globe reporters on purpose to make people think it might have been Kerry.

Am I sane or is my tinfoil hat on too tight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. When all is said and done, military service doesn't seem to matter...
...to a whole heck of a lot of people.

Dumbo got away with it, and the media really tried to make Clinton's avoidance into WWIII, but most people didn't care.

True, people in the South cared about Clinton, but didn't care about Bush--they right-wing and hypocrites, and ya ain't gonna get their votes no matter what!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Y1 = Yalie Deferrment?
The is the Arizona Republic(an) after all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EagleEye Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Better to beat this horse to death now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes. We all know the story but most people
still don't know who the candidates are, much less their military service records. People will ask. There's nothing there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. I defer to polpilot on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Aside from intrique, or dis-intrique . . .
snip
Dean drew a relatively low lottery number, 143 out of 300, meaning he could have been called up after college, according to Lewis Brodsky, a Selective Service spokesman.
snip

I'll allow as to how an official Selective Service spokesman might know more about this than I. However, I was very studied up on draft rules and procedures and politics at exactly that time. Once the lottery method came in, the student deferment was totally irrelevant, in fact abolished. Even 'special' students (say part of your 'student' duties included designing nuclear weapons) were exempt not as students but as working in the 'vital national interest'. And even if 143 came up, the 1-Y would have still applied, so he wouldn't have been 'called up'. So the comment, and it's inclusion in this article just seem weird to me.

I think any media attention on our candidates' military service status should be seized upon as an opportunity to pound on aWol's disgraceful military record. I realize most elected officials, etc, are too chicken to do this, conveniently rationalizing it as 'old news', off-message or whatever. But everybody else should DO IT! Call in and email to talk shows, letters to the editor, etc. Was the President really AWOL for over a year? Will he release all his records to clear this up? What about the standing reward to any Alabama Guardsman who comes forward to confirm aWol's service during that period?

As a vet, I'm naturally pissed off that he was over the hill that long with NO punishment and NO accountability (his case may be without precedent). But I'm REALLY PISSED OFF that no one in mainstream media or with access will get this information before the public. Interest in our candidates' status is a natural chance to push this.




:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Another Bill C. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Arizona Republic
When I lived in Arizona, the Arizona Republic made no pretense about being anything but a Republican rag. If you wanted the "real" news, you had to pick up a free weekly shopper (I can't recall the name). The weekly shopper broke more news than the Arizona Republic. An example: faulty gas regulators were causing house explosions all over the valley. The regulators were made by Honeywell which had a big presence in Arizona. The story was "ignored" by the AR but the weekly shopper did an investigation and broke the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. This story has been out for awhile.
Some newspapers are just getting around to it. IThe Republic being a more conservative rag, I doubt they would print anything to HELP John Kerry. For Rove, yes. Kerry, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Guess who owns the Arizona Republic(an)?
Here's a hint... He's dumb, and he can't spell "potato".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is OLD
Why are we hounding this to death? I'm a Kerry supporter and I find Howard's back about as interesting as what shampoo Edwards uses. This is the kind of thread I wish would get locked around here. It is totally a NONISSUE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC