Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who are Halliburton's competitors?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ivory_Tower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:29 PM
Original message
Who are Halliburton's competitors?
This is a question I've been wondering about for a while (ever since I heard about the no-bid contracts, I guess).

The reason I'm asking: I was discussing this with a friend of mine a couple of weeks ago. He had gotten his degree in Petroleum Engineering (I think that's what it was called) in the mid-eighties. He told me that at that time, Halliburton was the only American company that did that kind of work (oil extraction infrastructures, I guess?), so he wasn't surprised that the contracts in Iraq were no-bid.

He also told me that their only major competitor was a French company (who, I would venture to guess, had the Iraq contracts before the war). To me, that's even more interesting than sole-sourcing Halliburton. It could partly explain France's opposition to the invasion and also this administration's cavalier attitude toward pissing off the French.

Of course, his information is nearly twenty years old, so I don't know how things have changed since then.

So, what other companies do the same type of work as Halliburton today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. On 60 minutes they just covered another Texas company
that did many of the same things for less money during Gulf War1. I didn't get the name of the company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ivory_Tower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. D'oh!
Another show besides "The Simpsons" that I miss!

Yeah, that's what prompted my post -- I saw people mentioning that the Halliburton piece was coming up, and it reminded me of the conversation I had. I was going to post it back then, but got distracted by something shiny.

Thanks. I'll have to check the web for a transcript.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Allow me to save you some time, my friend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ivory_Tower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Thanks!
40MB -- it's times like this I'm glad I got DSL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. The one from Lubbock or
Amarillo? Yeah, owned by that old Texas cowboy. He was pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. American citizens
at least when it comes to getting money/services from the federal government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hahahahahahahahaha!!!!
Halliburton's competitors!??? Oh, boy. That's rich. They don't have no stinkin' competitors!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Halliburton Has An Exclusive 5 Year Contract
No competition!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KFC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here
http://biz.yahoo.com/p/_energy-oilsrv.html

The French company is probably Schlumberger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yup. Schlumberger is huge.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ivory_Tower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Yes, Schlumberger, that was it
Thanks for the link. Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Besides the Mafia? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wwagsthedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. A couple of links
http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=hal&x=15&y=15

http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=slb&x=14&y=11

Schlumberger may be the "French" company referred to but it is incorporated in the Netherlands Antilles if I'm not mistaken. One economic reason that France opposed the war may have been that Iraq owed them a lot of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. snooping around hoovers.com - a couple of names show up
Edited on Sun Sep-21-03 09:55 PM by cosmicdot
Top Competitors

Baker Hughes
Schlumberger
Technip

it mentions
"36 Competitors Listed For Halliburton"
but, to link to that info, one has to have a subscription
however

by linking to Baker Hughes, Schlumberger, etc., "other" names emerge, such as

BJ Services
Smith International

http://www.hoovers.com/free/co/factsheet.xhtml?COID=10697

good to see Halliburton becoming a household name :)
and, the association with Sneer Cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. some links to Halliburton info
"Halliburton, the file, 2 Sept. 2002"

http://www.democraticunderground.com/cgi-bin/duforum/duboard.cgi?az=show_thread&om=6540&forum=DCForumID38&archive=

NY Times (requires free sign up)
"In Tough Times, a Company Finds Profits in Terror War"

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/13/business/13HALL.html?ex=1064289600&en=0d17d064b744b939&ei=5070

"The War on Terrorism's Gravy Train -
Cheney's Former Company Wins Afghanistan War Contracts"

http://www.corpwatch.org/issues/PID.jsp?articleid=2471

"Force Provider: The Base in a Box"
http://www.corpwatch.org/issues/PID.jsp?articleid=2468
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. Cheney's Energy Task Force discussed the list of international competitors
... for Halliburton, long before the US invasion. Attendees of the Cheney-Ken Lay White House Energy Task Force received lists of international competitors for Iraqi drilling and reconstruction rights. (See http://www.judicialwatch.org/071703.b_PR.shtml -- click through the URL at the bottom pointing to oil maps of Iraq they got, too!). The list includes Total Elf Aquitaine (France), Preussag (Germany), CNPC (China), Ranger (Canada), and dozens of other big corporations capable of managing multi-billion-dollar projects.Though Halliburton's Brown Root division has a long history of work in Vietnam and other places where US armed forces paved the way, there's no shortage of international competition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ivory_Tower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yeah, but there was no way a foreign firm would get the work
This administration would have never awarded an Iraq oil contact to a non-US firm. But if there were other American competitors out there, the no-bid award looks even more suspicious. And from the other posts in this thread, it looks like there were other American firms capable of this work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Halliburton Has An Exclusive 5 Year Contract With The US
There is no competition and will be no competition until the contract expires in 3 or 4 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Are huge contracts written in stone? What's to stop the White House...
... from pressuring Halliburton to SUBCONTRACT some of that work to other companies, under a threat of canceling the whole thing? Pressure on President Rove can lead to pressure on Halliburton to share the White House's generosity with the Treasury's borrowed money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Somebody already mentioned Schlumberger...
but how could you forget Bechtel?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC